Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rec'd TheCowsCameHome May 2013 #1
In the current climate... Pelican May 2013 #2
Since strong 2A supporters have expanded the RKBA so dramatically, Eleanors38 May 2013 #33
It isn't 50/50... Pelican May 2013 #38
I kind if agree with you. I think their is a kind if stasis regarding armed civilians... Eleanors38 May 2013 #41
I left another forum after attempting to engage some of these alleged sensible ones Benton D Struckcheon May 2013 #3
Let me mention one for you that might jiggle recognition nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #4
I've been thinking that the Brady people did it wrong. Ian David May 2013 #5
That would have definitely been more productive. LAGC May 2013 #8
Brady doesn't have an extreme position. But it's hard to sell being anti-something. Ian David May 2013 #10
Wanting to ban handguns is a pretty extreme position. LAGC May 2013 #11
^^^ THIS ^^^ Skip Intro May 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Go Vols May 2013 #16
Meh. The fringe defines the debate. Robb May 2013 #20
No more extreme than single payer healthcare. DanTex May 2013 #32
It's still a stated goal of VPC Recursion May 2013 #35
I stand corrected. I didn't know anyone was advocating for a handgun ban. DanTex May 2013 #36
Not as hard as working with group of right wing bigots who spent millions trying to defeat Obama. Hoyt May 2013 #29
There are many that fit that definition The Straight Story May 2013 #6
My reasons for wanting or not wanting certain things done... krispos42 May 2013 #7
Dichotomies like that don't work very well. rrneck May 2013 #9
Form a politically sensible group of gun owners to work with. morningfog May 2013 #12
That's another dichotomy. rrneck May 2013 #13
And what I am saying is there is no group with any political power speaking for sane morningfog May 2013 #14
When you produce workable gun legislation rrneck May 2013 #17
The 80 million, if accurate, are letting a radical minority represent them. morningfog May 2013 #22
The NRA represents its membership. rrneck May 2013 #28
And by the way... rrneck May 2013 #42
I vote for pro-gun control Congressmen hack89 May 2013 #18
Not if you also support the NRA. Robb May 2013 #21
Please define "sensible gun owner," and contrast with non-sensible gun owner. n/t Skip Intro May 2013 #19
No. If you disagree with the NRA positions, offer your alternatives. morningfog May 2013 #23
You used the term. Can you not define it? n/t Skip Intro May 2013 #40
Here's a pro gun club that's geared towards liberals. premium May 2013 #24
I think the reason guys like me PD Turk May 2013 #25
most people want to restrict your behavior but not their own galileoreloaded May 2013 #26
There is no trust davidn3600 May 2013 #27
Let me try this out on you. geckosfeet May 2013 #30
The problem with your outlook... Eleanors38 May 2013 #31
Somebody needs to write actually sensible legislation Recursion May 2013 #34
The NY legislation was not sensible. Neither is the proposed MA legislation. CO, legislation, geckosfeet May 2013 #37
Amen! The problem is ALL gun owners, not just the "NRA types". hughee99 May 2013 #39
I see what your did there CokeMachine May 2013 #44
actually there is gejohnston May 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There is no sensible gun ...»Reply #40