Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
45. Here is the funding answer. No Major Corporate Donors.
Sun May 5, 2013, 01:07 AM
May 2013

Last edited Sun May 5, 2013, 02:24 PM - Edit history (4)

The largest donation to MTA so far has been from the Levinson Foundation: http://www.levinsonfoundation.org (click on Recent Grants to see grantees). There are no corporate sponsors or donors - as in no major corporations or Super-PACs. The rest of their funding is from individual contributions which average $40. The list of people registered with MTA is just under 300,000. That's not the number of donors. It includes anyone who wants to get notifications and newsletters and people who want to volunteer.

It was a good, and relevant question. I'm pleased with the answer.

On Edit: The Levinson Foundation's site states their largest grants are $30,000. So, even if they contributed that much to MTA that is a not an amount that would buy undue influence. Also, I've worked for a non-profit, grant-making organization like the Levnison Foundation. Grants are awarded on the strength of the applicant's grant application and, perhaps, interviews with the director/officers of an organization. It really depends on the size of the grant. After a grant is awarded there is no participation by the granting organization in the management of those funds. The grantee is trusted to use the funds in the manner in which they described in their application. Again, that would vary base on the size of a grant and if grants have some annual funding component. In the case of large grants that might be funded over multiple years it wouldn't be unusual for a granting organization to do audits.

For a $30,000 one-time grant it would be a "write the check and walk away" grant.

On Edit 3: While the Levinson Foundation is, itself, a corporation I didn't think I needed to point out the difference between small 501c3 non-profit organizations like the Levinson Foundation and larger organizations like GE, Monsanto, BofA, GM, Exxon, etc. The large entities I mentioned pay little or no taxes yet have undue influence on our government and law due to their money and lobbying. A grant-making organization like the Levinson Foundation is not corrupting our elections and laws with lobbying.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Instead of... defacto7 May 2013 #1
Interesting Point. I'll Bring it up tomorrow. dballance May 2013 #2
"on their board"? jberryhill May 2013 #21
Again, You're Getting It Wrong. There's no Desire to Lock out Corps Completely. dballance May 2013 #32
Unfortunately, I can read jberryhill May 2013 #36
I didn't get a chance to work this in today. But I haven't forgotten about it. dballance May 2013 #46
This would mean unions would lose their rights also. former9thward May 2013 #3
Unions Don't Have the Rights That Corporations Have. dballance May 2013 #4
Unions spent $141 million last year on the election. former9thward May 2013 #5
Sounds like a very god deal to me dreamnightwind May 2013 #7
Question jberryhill May 2013 #9
You're equating dreamnightwind May 2013 #11
That's only the tip of the iceberg jberryhill May 2013 #13
What changes would you make to the proposed amendment? dreamnightwind May 2013 #14
To accomplish what goal? jberryhill May 2013 #18
To the goal of dreamnightwind May 2013 #22
What anyone thinks is irrelevant jberryhill May 2013 #23
Let me ask a simpler and more pointed question jberryhill May 2013 #16
NO, Not Necessarily. The Amendment Doesn't Do That. dballance May 2013 #34
That's already constitutional jberryhill May 2013 #37
Seems Rather Paltry Compared to the $658 Million Spent By Finance/Insurance/Real Estate Sector dballance May 2013 #52
You are leaving out a big number. former9thward May 2013 #53
I Don't See How Individual Volunteers are Relevant to the Argument. dballance May 2013 #54
K&R cprise May 2013 #6
Down goes US v. New York Times Corp. jberryhill May 2013 #8
I Think Those Two Cases Could Have Ignored "Free Speech" and Been Ruled as Freedom of the Press dballance May 2013 #10
Read the proposed language jberryhill May 2013 #12
One of the Points People Fail to Realize is the Amendment is Just the Beginning dballance May 2013 #29
Your proposal eliminates freedom of the press. jeff47 May 2013 #19
That may be partially true. Laelth May 2013 #40
Doesn't matter if the people do still have rights. They rely on the paper to get the story out. jeff47 May 2013 #42
I see your point. Laelth May 2013 #43
Whoa jberryhill May 2013 #44
I was inarticulate jeff47 May 2013 #49
Actually, the court didn't say that jberryhill May 2013 #50
who funds move to amend? HiPointDem May 2013 #15
Excellent Question. dballance May 2013 #17
while i'm in sympathy with the apparent goals, never underestimate the duplicity of the ruling HiPointDem May 2013 #26
The 14th Amendment is the one you're thinking of. dballance May 2013 #31
Wise, HiPointDem. Quite wise. n/t Laelth May 2013 #41
I hesitate to ask... jberryhill May 2013 #20
ironic, wot? HiPointDem May 2013 #24
I'm in the wrong business jberryhill May 2013 #25
signs of the times point to that as a good career move. assuming you're the charismatic type. HiPointDem May 2013 #27
I don't think it matters jberryhill May 2013 #28
yes, but some kind of charisma or connections is needed to get to that stage of visibility where HiPointDem May 2013 #30
A good website jberryhill May 2013 #35
Here is the funding answer. No Major Corporate Donors. dballance May 2013 #45
Wrong again jberryhill May 2013 #48
K&R! Fire Walk With Me May 2013 #33
Thank you DB Berlum May 2013 #38
I support the goals of MTA. Laelth May 2013 #39
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2013 #47
A Nattering Nabob Finally Got me to Use the Ignore Member Feature dballance May 2013 #51
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Just Came from the Open...»Reply #45