General Discussion

kctim

(3,575 posts)

37. Well that totally explains

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:15 PM

Feb 2012

why liberals/progressives are winning in every red district, doesn't it.

This isn't the early 1900s, people can easily find out where the candidate stands on the issues, so there is no avoiding them.

But, I'm a fair guy, so tell you what: pick ANY Marlboro Man look-alike you want, have him ignore taxes, the 2nd Amendment, gay marriage, abortion etc... and preach only about his opinion of 'economic justice,' have the Party support him and run him in MY district and see if he wins.
IF he does, I am wrong and you are right.
When he does not, we will chalk it up as all the others before him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's A Curious Thing To Be Accused Of Depressing Democratic Votes, When Elected Democratics... [View all] WillyT Feb 2012 OP

Vote out the blue dogs. All of them. Zalatix Feb 2012 #1

Well, in 2010 tosh Feb 2012 #3

So The Vote Stayed The Same, Huh... WillyT Feb 2012 #4

Except that "R" counted towards the Republican majority. So that's not the same. SharonAnn Feb 2012 #50

Dem voters pooched the screw in 2010. Zalatix Feb 2012 #5

+1 Scuba Feb 2012 #25

Yeah, and that was an improvement....not. Ikonoklast Feb 2012 #6

I'm guessing you have to include votes to praise the heroism of Gabby Giffords' Aide to hit 80% LooseWilly Feb 2012 #14

My former blue dog tosh Feb 2012 #26

My problem with this strategy is that if we don't allow Blue Dogs within the party justiceischeap Feb 2012 #27

+1 loyalsister Feb 2012 #48

I disagree, most Blue Dogs are tools of corporate interests dreamnightwind Feb 2012 #54

+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! WillyT Feb 2012 #56

Well said. We will have thieves woo me with science Feb 2012 #30

Yes, but some seem to think we owe allegiance to and work for politicians, instead of quinnox Feb 2012 #2

How far do voters allow democratic politicians to stray from the platform?... jaw droppingly far? LooseWilly Feb 2012 #7

It's Curious That They Alerted On This One.. WillyT Feb 2012 #9

Right from the Romney playbook noise Feb 2012 #8

Its attitudes like this that quinnox Feb 2012 #10

LOL !!! - I Thought He/She Was Being Sarcastic WillyT Feb 2012 #11

Nope, I think that post was deadly serious quinnox Feb 2012 #12

Well... It's Definitely "Deadly"... WillyT Feb 2012 #13

I agree that the lack of noise Feb 2012 #15

Then the terrorists win. FarLeftFist Feb 2012 #16

Okay this has to be an example of Poe's Law. white_wolf Feb 2012 #17

wow quinnox Feb 2012 #18

Your feigned bewilderment might work on a Romney site noise Feb 2012 #20

Ok, you are putting me on quinnox Feb 2012 #23

Are you keeping disloyalty scores for everyone? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #43

Romney/al Qaeda 2012 Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #19

Ha I wonder which is less popular with GOP voters? white_wolf Feb 2012 #21

That's what I was thinking! Starry Messenger Feb 2012 #24

Faith In Our Leaders ??? WillyT Feb 2012 #22

"lack of faith in our leaders" ? bvar22 Feb 2012 #34

Do you think our "leaders" are like Gods or something? Creepy Jim Jones quality to your posts... Dragonfli Feb 2012 #38

"faith" "devotion" "al Qaeda" and the earlier "unconditional support" suffragette Feb 2012 #41

Dear God. Puglover Feb 2012 #44

this was the one proposing a "voluntary" loyalty oath last night DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2012 #33

I prefer blood oaths punishable by death when I join a cult, what he proposes just isn't as sexy as Dragonfli Feb 2012 #42

The key word being voluntary noise Feb 2012 #58

You what would be cool for DU3? bvar22 Feb 2012 #35

Excellent point dreamnightwind Feb 2012 #57

dumb fascisthunter Feb 2012 #46

du rec. nt xchrom Feb 2012 #28

When parties become corporate products, woo me with science Feb 2012 #29

"Give 'Em HELL Harry" Agrees! bvar22 Feb 2012 #31

"NEW" Democrats don't listen to Harry silly, they have think tanks full of conservatives now Dragonfli Feb 2012 #40

Ding Ding Ding! fascisthunter Feb 2012 #47

Elected officials kctim Feb 2012 #32

OTOH, bvar22 Feb 2012 #36

Well that totally explains kctim Feb 2012 #37

I'll make it easier. bvar22 Feb 2012 #39

In my district kctim Feb 2012 #45

Why guess? bvar22 Feb 2012 #49

Aw, Bob, there you go confusing people with your facts and experiences Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2012 #51

Wellstone jsmirman Feb 2012 #55

I love those polls and those who hang on them as gospel kctim Feb 2012 #61

It's a curious thing to dismiss the disenfranchised who rely on us to get them out and vote... joshcryer Feb 2012 #52

I Hear Ya... But There Used To Be This Thing Called A WHIP... And Party Discipline... WillyT Feb 2012 #53

This is what happened: joshcryer Feb 2012 #59

The White House AND the Congressional Party leadership KNOWS how to do this, bvar22 Feb 2012 #60