Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(45,851 posts)

12. Ahem...

Sun May 5, 2013, 09:40 AM

May 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Did republicans have a 60+ majority during the Bush years? [View all] boston bean May 2013 OP

We kept our powder dry. Pab Sungenis May 2013 #1

Filibuster Abuse: Only One Side Does It. HughBeaumont May 2013 #3

the tax cuts only needed 50 votes dsc May 2013 #5

that was under Obama by that time dsc May 2013 #18

My point is that numbers have never been our problem. dawg May 2013 #20

the fact is many liberals disagree with us on the tax cuts dsc May 2013 #21

Taxes should be high enough to fund the needs of the nation ... dawg May 2013 #23

Only took him 4 short months to get his tax cuts for the rich. RandiFan1290 May 2013 #6

Democrats believe in Democracy, Republicans do not. tridim May 2013 #7

51-49 is Democracy, 40-60 is not. hobbit709 May 2013 #9

So if... doggie breath May 2013 #24

Ahem... Fumesucker May 2013 #12

Third Way/DLC, war hawks and alsame May 2013 #13

Democrats and republicans playing for the same team ~ the 1%. Zorra May 2013 #14

"Bill Frist never had 60 votes. Bill Frist never cared." Nye Bevan May 2013 #15

That's the problem in a nutshell. senseandsensibility May 2013 #16

Because the problem isn't just Obama. dawg May 2013 #19

Bush passed his war, and did reconciliation for his tax cut Recursion May 2013 #22