Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(64,700 posts)

12. I think there is some brain power over at

Sun May 5, 2013, 12:22 PM

May 2013

Free Republic that could dig into this.

.

.
.
(sarcasm for the humor impaired)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For the DU Mathematicians - Elegant New Approach To 350-Year-Old Math Riddle [View all] malaise May 2013 OP

Well, between McLarty and Friedman ... ananda May 2013 #1

In Fermat's version n is a power, not a multiplier Progressive dog May 2013 #2

... Princess Turandot May 2013 #4

Thanks it was bugging me. nt Progressive dog May 2013 #5

x[sup]n[/sup] + y[sup]n[/sup] = z[sup]n[/sup] eppur_se_muova May 2013 #7

Number theory, where the real nerds romp and play. bemildred May 2013 #6

This is not a new idea adieu May 2013 #9

My guess remains that the "proof" Fermat conjectured jimlup May 2013 #10

This is true edhopper May 2013 #11

The marginal notation edhopper May 2013 #14

I think there is some brain power over at rurallib May 2013 #12

Best laugh of the day malaise May 2013 #16