Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The spiel that employers will cut employee hours to 29 hrs/wk because of the ACA. [View all]dawg
(10,777 posts)13. Maybe we need a surtax on employers who have too great a percentage of part-time employees.
That'd fix it right up, pronto.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The spiel that employers will cut employee hours to 29 hrs/wk because of the ACA. [View all]
Honeycombe8
May 2013
OP
I'm not confused. Yes, having health ins. does give a person access to health care.
Honeycombe8
May 2013
#23
Once yu get ins., you get annual preventive exams FOR FREE. You have access to health care.
Honeycombe8
May 2013
#29
Access to health care means being treated by medical professionals when you need it
Fumesucker
May 2013
#30
agree, I've never had a parttime job as a basic worker that paid any kind of benefits except for
Sunlei
May 2013
#5
So...the people they hired so they wouldn't have to hire permanet, full time workers....
Honeycombe8
May 2013
#15
At our college the adjuncts are being cut back on the number of classes they can teach per year.
Gidney N Cloyd
May 2013
#17
But now they will get money from the govt to buy insurance. Unless they have ins. already.
Honeycombe8
May 2013
#18
I don't deal with it directly but at our college the contracts define faculty works hrs per course.
Gidney N Cloyd
May 2013
#35
We keep a low student to teacher ratio here. Can't speak for other colleges.
Gidney N Cloyd
May 2013
#40
The purpose is to make it affordable. That's what I know. Don't be a Debbie Downer.
Honeycombe8
May 2013
#26
And stupid too... Can you say "TB epidemic" from restaurants that don't provide health coverage?...
cascadiance
May 2013
#16
Maybe we need a surtax on employers who have too great a percentage of part-time employees.
dawg
May 2013
#13
That's great, but it doesn't help the worker whose hours, and hence pay, have been cut n/t
markpkessinger
May 2013
#27