Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just because I KNOW somebody will copy and paste [View all]MineralMan
(151,269 posts)19. No, you were taking me to task for what I did not write.
I write what I write. In this case I was writing about the original story and about how amateurishly it was handled. Others are perfectly capable of writing what they want to say, and you're perfectly capable of addressing what they have written. Your expectation that I would write about what others said about the story is unrealistic. I did not choose to do that, because that was not my subject.
Don't expect me to write anything but what I actually write. Then, we'll get along just fine. If you criticize me for what I have not written, then we will not get along so well. I am not a whipping boy for what others say. I'm fairly careful about what I write, and I think others should be, too. If they are not, it is none of my affair.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hopefully people would be more polite next time when a story seems questionable.
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#6
Actually I wasn't talking about you. Just pointing out that there are others who
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#8
I addressed your comment because you failed to note the behavior of others in Nadin's
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#12
I don't understand why you feel targeted. You made a comment on a subject that was
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#17
Taking you to task? A comment on an internet blog is not taking someone to task. It is
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#30
Actually, her getting the last word, MM, would necessitate you shutting your trap. nt
Bonobo
Feb 2012
#71
I thought it was instructive to see the assumption that having the last word is would be
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#93
MM, I just want you to know that we all saw what was posted and you are 100% correct
Number23
Feb 2012
#55
Can you point where I do not hold myself to those standards? I am always willing to
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#45
Interesting, thank you. Another interesting aspect of online bullying, which came up
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#50
There is a big difference between disinformation, which is a deliberate attempt to
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#67
The call was for an end to bullying. I don't think that was meant to be a deflection of anything,
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#87
Thank you....missed the original thread and could make absolutely no sense of this thread
Rowdyboy
Feb 2012
#53
Excellent post, thank you. The notion that there are any journalistic standards
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#54
I think the news wire in general, the dry, classic reporting, is still decent.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#79
Oh I wouldn't worry about that. Our 'journalists' who reported totally false imformation
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#41
As a freelance reporter, I can only hope you get yourself some training and an editor who knows what
Brickbat
Feb 2012
#14
I would disagree, I would say you have more to worry about from our so-called
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#47
You're still WAAAY more reputable than Drudge, Fox, Redstate. And WAAAY more classy.
FarLeftFist
Feb 2012
#33
True, but citizen journalists wouldn't link to a news source usually because...
FarLeftFist
Feb 2012
#39
True, and thank you for pointing that out. Could also be said about the more 'respectable'
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#44
Handling a mistake with grace says more than making a mistake. We all make mistakes
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#38