Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DoD Training Manual: Protests are "Low-Level Terrorism" [View all]themadstork
(899 posts)16. Hardly any of that involves actual terror
Political discord, boycotts, or suggesting that the wealthy elites may be worried about the security of their financial position in the midst of economic discontent - has the integrity our public discourse degraded such that we actually associate such acts with real terrorism?
I was talking to a couple of conservatives once that thought DDoS attacks could be construed as acts of terror. It got to the point that I began to think they might construe me looking at them in the wrong way as an act of terror.
'Terrorism' is used in a way nowadays that the term is almost completely disconnected from the way a serious historian, political scientist, or sociologist might use it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, but I am not feeling any safer because it is becoming transparent. In fact I feel more
jwirr
Dec 2011
#42
See Kent State for how that "force protection" from "terrorists" works.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2011
#3
"Low level terrorism?" Who thought that term up? Is it like being sort of pregnant?
BeHereNow
Dec 2011
#6
All your verbal gymnastics demonstrate is that one person's terrorist is
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#22
Back in the 1790s the Federalists called Democratic-Republican activists "Terrorists".
Odin2005
Dec 2011
#47
Wow, I had no idea. Thanks. Actually, a thorough etymology of the word and its
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#49
Exactly! Meant to scare people into complying, conforming, and not uttering a peep.
Sarah Ibarruri
Dec 2011
#17
You're either with us or a'gin' us: any one having the temerity to question any policy or
indepat
Dec 2011
#18
As we have seen, there is low-level terrorism....perpetrated by the police. n/t
AntiFascist
Dec 2011
#32
Xe and the like will do as they are paid to as will the vast majority of law enforcement
TheKentuckian
Dec 2011
#38