Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,207 posts)
20. And you're right to have those doubts.
Mon May 6, 2013, 09:49 AM
May 2013

But, it doesn't matter, really. This plastic thing and most zip guns are meant to be used at point-blank range, anyhow. Accuracy and the ability to fire multiple rounds aren't really issues at all for such weapons. They're throwaways to begin with.

The only thing unique about this printed single-use weapon is that it's printed. I can, and have, made a .25 ACP single-use zip gun with nothing but materials purchased at my local Ace Hardware. The only tool needed was an electric drill and a couple of drill bits. It took me less than half an hour to assemble the thing, which fired just fine the first time.

The difference was that I didn't need an $8000 3D printer to accomplish this. I made it to win a $20 bet with a guy who said it couldn't be done. I didn't hold the thing when it was test-fired, but it clearly demonstrated that I could have.

A later project, also made on a bet, was a 12 ga. shotgun, also made with almost unaltered hardware store components.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Only a matter of time. nt rrneck May 2013 #1
Great. They have this advanced technology and decide to be as primitive as possible. MrSlayer May 2013 #2
It's the American way rightsideout May 2013 #27
Might have known one of the first things they'd print would be a fucking gun Warpy May 2013 #3
Swords are useful enough .... oldhippie May 2013 #6
If they do that, they'll starve. Warpy May 2013 #9
Of course every new technology will be used for making weapons...and porn. MindPilot May 2013 #29
Actually, I think we try to eat it first Warpy May 2013 #30
a single shot gun produced on an $8000 printer? NightWatcher May 2013 #4
True - but a few years from now and your looking at something else. TampaAnimusVortex May 2013 #11
Reliable, multi-shot, high power printed firearms are a LONG way off fortunately. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #5
Indeed. Luckily these cant be modified to include a metal barrel... TampaAnimusVortex May 2013 #12
Cutting hardened metal barrels is not exactly easy. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #14
One doesnt need hardened metal... TampaAnimusVortex May 2013 #15
Yeah, I am not just guessing. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #17
Who needs a barrel when a basic pipe will do? NickB79 May 2013 #16
I have doubts about the accuracy of a smooth bore barrel at 30 feet. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #18
And you're right to have those doubts. MineralMan May 2013 #20
That $8000 dollar printer now will be a $300 dollar printer shortly. TampaAnimusVortex May 2013 #21
Actually, no. There will be some sort of 3D MineralMan May 2013 #23
Everything in your post is incorrect. Occulus May 2013 #28
Who said anything about cutting hardened steel? jmowreader May 2013 #19
At this level of mass production, it only has to work once. MindPilot May 2013 #31
There are probably not going to be any further developments in plastics MindPilot May 2013 #22
You were saying about printing in metals? pediatricmedic May 2013 #24
We have these where I work -- aerospace fabrication MindPilot May 2013 #25
What's the real point of this? Blue_Tires May 2013 #7
Blow through any and all gun control legislation nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #8
Pew pew pew! Robb May 2013 #10
I'd still rather have a p227 ileus May 2013 #13
Or, someone evil could just get one from his mother ... eom Kolesar May 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Meet The 'Liberator': Tes...»Reply #20