Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
9. That's kind of my thoughts
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:11 PM
May 2013

It's been so damn long, what kind of evidence can there really be to determine what really happened? The child got hit. Are we SURE he was the driver, and didn't hit the kid after someone else did?

How did they find all of this out 45 years later? Did he confess? And if he did confess, did he really even do it? He could have been hauling around guilt for 45 years of something he did, but wasn't exactly as he remembered it.

I don't know. It's just so damn long ago, and if he's been out of trouble since, I have a hard time knowing what to think about all of this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's a problem to chew ...»Reply #9