Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
15. AofU isn't suing them
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:15 PM
May 2013

Last edited Tue May 7, 2013, 01:13 PM - Edit history (1)

Dan said he even told the reporter last night that he wasn't planning any legal action, and the reporter ran with the lawsuit idea anyway:

I told Chris that I hadn't ruled it out, but that I also had no current plans for a suit. He mentioned the case(s) against the florists who refused to deliver flowers for Jessica Ahlquist, and said that they were being sued under state laws. He asked if Utah had any similar laws, and I replied that I don't know. I told him that the only thing I could think of that even comes close is Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but that TIKI specifically said they disagreed with the message on the shirts, not necessarily the fact that we are atheist, and so they probably were _not_ violating the law.

Basically, Chris Jones kept trying to make the story more sensational and sounded like he desperately wanted me to say we're going to sue the pants (or, in this case, shirts) off of TIKI Printing, and then twisted things to suit the narrative he was promoting.

I know, it's difficult to think that a member of the news media would do such a thing, right? Ha!


TIKI has the entire email exchange up on their Facebook page. Initially they did just refuse the entire order on religious grounds; it wasn't until Dan brought up possible legal violations that they were suddenly OK with printing the web address but not the graphic.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A dumb business decision IMO, but what are the grounds for a lawsuit? Nye Bevan May 2013 #1
When you open your doors to the public, you can't discriminate. backscatter712 May 2013 #2
I knew that applied to restaurants, stores etc. Nye Bevan May 2013 #3
That's what I thought. When I read this in the religion group my reaction was... hrmjustin May 2013 #4
that is for public accomodations. Shivering Jemmy May 2013 #6
All businesses that sell goods & services to the public are covered. backscatter712 May 2013 #7
Vote all you want. former9thward May 2013 #11
I'm not sure that technically applies in this case. Warren DeMontague May 2013 #13
That wouldn't apply here. FBaggins May 2013 #8
The Constitution Applies to Government, NOT Private Businesses. They Can Discriminate Legally. dballance May 2013 #19
Would there be support here for a group of Christians codemoguy May 2013 #5
Perhaps you should read the following wiki entry MattBaggins May 2013 #9
seems like an equivilant set of facts to me...n/t codemoguy May 2013 #10
A hypothetical situation never meets the test for being called facts MattBaggins May 2013 #12
Oh please. You must have an incredibly weak argument tritsofme May 2013 #16
We could stay on topic? MattBaggins May 2013 #17
I find it is very much on topic tritsofme May 2013 #18
i do not do business with various right wing companies and they shoud be able to avoid doing buisnes dembotoz May 2013 #14
AofU isn't suing them LadyHawkAZ May 2013 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Utah Christian company re...»Reply #15