Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
7. Not entirely unprecedented.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 06:35 PM
Feb 2012

When al Sadr first came to prominence there was a massive operation in a Shia cemetery. People leaping/sniping literally from gravestone to gravestone. It took the Iraqi Ayetollah basically telling al Sadr to settle the f*** down to end it before the US moved in and shot-up the shrine to finish off the last of them.

I don't know if having ground troops do it instead of drones is "fairer" but I'm informed by others that while cemeteries, hospitals, civilian homes et al are generally considered "protected." HOWEVER, if an enemy is using a protected site as a fighting position it loses its protection and the enemy is actually legally liable under the laws of war. Of course al Sadr was using a cemetery as a fighting position, just standing around in a cemetery is a non-hostile act. I'd hate to think our current CinC *might* be doing more than just loosening the Rules of Engagement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CIA drone strikes target ...»Reply #7