General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Belief That "Second Coming" May Be Preventing Climate Change Action [View all]Nihil
(13,508 posts)>> I notice that you're still banned over there for repeated trolling so I guess that
>> you've set up camp in GD instead
>
> Even though I had never actually done such a thing (and you damn well know it, too) even once
You were always trolling - and yes, I damn well know it too - and you are apparently doing the same
here: your first post on this thread (#15) introduces your favourite term "climate doomers" and
your second (#16) directly links "believing in 24-karat bullshit" to "our friends at E & E".
> and there were REAL trolls that I was victimized by who were NEVER held to account
> for ANY of their bullshit.
Well I must apologise as I don't recall ever seeing you on the receiving end of a troll post
but, as you are so certain about it, I'm sure it must have happened and it isn't just another
attempt to deflect.
> What denialism? You know, every time I ask a doomer troll what they mean by "denialism",
> they always end up being evasive and scurrying away like fucking cockroaches, or giving
> out half-baked answers that make no real sense.
In your case:
1) Constantly spreading FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) over scientific evidence that is clear,
consistent and undeniable (except by one vested in opposing science & logic).
2) Distraction from the topics that cause discomfort to the denier's worldview.
3) Repeatedly thread-jacking then diversion to luke-warm whining (e.g., finishing your note
with an attempt to link opponents to "Obama bashers" ... really?).
4) Refusal to accept that solutions (or mitigation attempts if one wishes to be more honest)
will most definitely mean the end of Business As Usual, usually by means of thinly-veiled
prayers to the Gods of Future Technology to preserve the level of luxury currently enjoyed.
5) Repeatedly replying to posts attacking the extreme denier mentality with a red herring
implying that taking a bleak view of the situation is somehow "the same thing" - the
desperate attempt to create a false equivalence in order that the resulting centrism
(also known as Business As Usual) is the only realistic response.
No, you have never adopted the moronic Inhofe or Monckton level of stupidityand that
has not been an accusation of you (AFAIK) as you play the game far smarter than that.
You are not primarily a seller of lies, merely a spreader of FUD and a poster of distractions.
> For all your whining about supposed "trolling", you sure are looking like a total hypocrite right about now.
Nope, I know that when it's got to the stage where you have to hide behind the facade of being
"an Obama supporter", the associated attempts to link people who dare to question your unsupported
smears to those "bashing the POTUS 24/7" and accusations of "'Chicken Little' paranoia" then
I have hit the sensitive spot once more.
Enjoy "moving back on now" in GD - I don't have time to keep track of the volume of traffic here
so I'm sure that your other dribblings will remain largely unopposed and you can even try to work
on that "kinda consider myself as an environmentalist, even if only casually so" image.