Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I fear for Julian Assange. I fear for Bradley Manning. I fear for us all. [View all]My reply was my "talking point".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I fear for Julian Assange. I fear for Bradley Manning. I fear for us all. [View all]
kpete
May 2013
OP
The pestilence of corporate totalitarianism is spreading rapidly over the earth.
progressoid
May 2013
#3
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act"
davidn3600
May 2013
#4
And there you have why the Liberal Arts are being destroyed in schools by bureaucrats.
WinkyDink
May 2013
#5
Yes, can't have the little beggars learning to THINK about things that don't have
Lydia Leftcoast
May 2013
#45
Even as the NRA, insane celebrities and politicians, and local sheriffs speak treason and sedition,
mountain grammy
May 2013
#10
I've always wondered why Manning/Assange are persecuted and yet Cheney/Novak walk(s,ed) free
KansDem
May 2013
#16
Julian Assange - the only probable rapist it's fashionable to admire.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2013
#22
You also missed the part where he skipped bail to avoid facing Swedish authorities.
randome
May 2013
#26
You're taking the simple way out on transparency: "It's us v. them", and "them" is bad.
toby jo
May 2013
#91
please, link to the official charges against him. Oh, there aren't any you say? Interesting...
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
May 2013
#64
That's utterly contemptible. Go look up how the Swedish legal system works.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2013
#69
Yep ~ "The pestilence of corporate totalitarianism is spreading rapidly over the earth"...
Zorra
May 2013
#32
You do know that's a principle specific to courts of law, not to general life, don't you?
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2013
#37
That's the position that you need to adopt to make the status quo seem acceptable.
sibelian
May 2013
#85
Swedish law is very different from that of other countries when it comes to rape.
mn9driver
May 2013
#42
What are you blathering about? Assange has not made any claims I am disputing.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2013
#73
No, ad hominem is attacking character as a means of attacking arguments.
Donald Ian Rankin
May 2013
#77
Why do you think that Wikileaks did not consider the impact on people's lives? Where did you
sabrina 1
May 2013
#57
A talking point. I did ask where you got it from but you didn't say. Headline grabber, okay here
sabrina 1
May 2013
#89
He SHOULD be worth much, much more for the excellent contributions he has made to the
sabrina 1
May 2013
#88