Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Baitball Blogger

(52,798 posts)
Thu May 9, 2013, 12:29 AM May 2013

I just figured out how to reach those who are apprehensive over gun control. [View all]

So I had a conversation with someone today who had stopped calling a while back when she realized I might be a socialist... Not that I am a socialist, but the last time I spoke to her was right before the Tucson shooting and she got rattled when I wasn't on board over her concerns that Glen Beck was afraid they were trying to take him off the air.

Today she called out of the blue and I noticed some changes. She was upset that everyone was out for themselves (and in this case, I think she was referring to Republicans.) She was even upset that I referred to her as a right-winger. So, among the extremes, there seems to be some sensitivity about being pegged with the really real crazys.

Seriously, though, we got to talking about gun control and we came to the usual impasse. She wasn't in support of background checks because it would lead to a registry, "and don't you know that they're trying to raise our fear levels so that we'll start a revolution so they'll have a reason to come after our guns!" (I'm not kidding.)

To which I responded, (and here is where I get really brilliant), C'mon. If you all really wanted to protect your weapons from the government, you know you're clever enough to hide them where no one can find them.

Seriously, there's a t.v. show on bunker building. How hard can it be to market furniture that has hidey holes to stock rifles and guns where no one can find them?

So, that's my contribution to the gun debate. We just convince them that they're clever enough to know how to hide their guns so that argument is no longer valid.

Will it fly?

BTW, I assume this qualifies under the Skinner gun exception rule. If not, let me know and I'll self-delete.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm not sure convincing them to commit more illegal acts is a great idea. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #1
How is it illegal to hide guns that are properly permitted? Baitball Blogger May 2013 #2
If our goal is to create registries, hiding firearms from the state becomes illegal. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #3
Okay, I made a correction to my original post. Baitball Blogger May 2013 #4
A registry provides a list of who owns what firearms and where they're located. Llewlladdwr May 2013 #5
Wouldn't you agree that the government couldn't get to everyone on Day One Baitball Blogger May 2013 #7
So then, no point in a registry, right? nt Llewlladdwr May 2013 #8
I was just concerned about the background check. Baitball Blogger May 2013 #11
The registry has a useful peacetime purpose. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #15
That's why we need to get over their apprehension. There is a lot of benefits we are losing because Baitball Blogger May 2013 #16
great evidence for tracking evil doers sigmasix May 2013 #17
Someone's got their tin foil on a little too tight. rl6214 May 2013 #22
Yes, but the point of hiding firearms is to conceal the fact that you own them. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #6
This is where the "clever" part comes in. Baitball Blogger May 2013 #9
I'm just not seeing how this is 'clever'. Llewlladdwr May 2013 #10
We are talking about the scenario that they fear the most. Baitball Blogger May 2013 #13
Well, it appears her fears are correct, if you and others think a registry is a good idea. Honeycombe8 May 2013 #25
Yeah, how could a registry be a bad idea? Gravitycollapse May 2013 #26
I'm not expressing opinion @ registry. Just sayin' that their supposed wacky fears are well founded, Honeycombe8 May 2013 #31
You are going to compare guns to persecuted jews? Gravitycollapse May 2013 #32
Yes. You're not listening because you don't want to. Honeycombe8 May 2013 #33
Clearly you haven't given it any thought. That much is obvious. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #34
And again TnDem May 2013 #35
Being skeptical is not the same as being paranoid. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #36
OK then.... TnDem May 2013 #37
Maybe we should take a look at the definitions... Gravitycollapse May 2013 #38
I believe the word you're looking for is 'penchant.' Common Sense Party May 2013 #12
Yes, you are absolutely right. Gravitycollapse May 2013 #14
Not gonna fly TnDem May 2013 #18
If there was ever a time when the government comes looking for your guns, which Baitball Blogger May 2013 #19
Wonderful, however.... TnDem May 2013 #20
I don't get the impression we heard the entire testimony. Baitball Blogger May 2013 #23
OK then... TnDem May 2013 #24
But this did not address her concerns Yo_Mama May 2013 #21
If guns were registered, I've heard so-called law-abiding gungeoneers say their boat capsized with Hoyt May 2013 #27
They are law abiding mwrguy May 2013 #28
Yep. Then, they try to absolve themselves with "Stand Your Ground" laws and similar crud. Hoyt May 2013 #29
So your solution customerserviceguy May 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I just figured out how to...