Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's good to know I'm not the only one who thinks the military's camouflage fetish has gone crazy. [View all]uppityperson
(116,036 posts)6. Did you read the article? It is quite interesting, talking about the larger issue with this as an ex
example. For instance....
Today, there is one camouflage pattern just for Marines in the desert. There is another just for Navy personnel in the desert. The Army has its own universal camouflage pattern, which is designed to work anywhere. It also has another one just for Afghanistan, where the first one doesnt work.
Even the Air Force has its own unique camouflage, used in a new Airman Battle Uniform. But it has flaws. So in Afghanistan, airmen are told not to wear it in battle.
In just 11 years, two kinds of camouflage have turned into 10. And a simple aspect of the U.S. government has emerged as a complicated and expensive case study in federal duplication.
Duplication is one of Washingtons most expensive traditions: Multiple agencies do the same job at the same time, and taxpayers pay billions for the government to repeat itself....
Even the Air Force has its own unique camouflage, used in a new Airman Battle Uniform. But it has flaws. So in Afghanistan, airmen are told not to wear it in battle.
In just 11 years, two kinds of camouflage have turned into 10. And a simple aspect of the U.S. government has emerged as a complicated and expensive case study in federal duplication.
Duplication is one of Washingtons most expensive traditions: Multiple agencies do the same job at the same time, and taxpayers pay billions for the government to repeat itself....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It's good to know I'm not the only one who thinks the military's camouflage fetish has gone crazy. [View all]
Aristus
May 2013
OP
Did you read the article? It is quite interesting, talking about the larger issue with this as an ex
uppityperson
May 2013
#6
I commented on that above. But these smaller contracts are a good place to start,
Aristus
May 2013
#8
There is that. I'd like to see the whole military budget looked at closely.
uppityperson
May 2013
#28
Unfortunately as long as the congress critters work for these big corps it won't happen
Marrah_G
May 2013
#30
When the military changes uniforms they are immediately available to the general public.
former9thward
May 2013
#23
When you get to things like camo prom dresses and camo wedding dresses....it's a fetish!!!
LongTomH
May 2013
#32
Well, call it an unhealthy obsession then. Although if 'unhealthy obsession' doesn't define 'fetish'
Aristus
May 2013
#17
All of that "wasted" money is going to Americans with jobs making those uniforms
Recursion
May 2013
#39