Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Police Chief Calls Out Armed Protest Threat In Washington DC [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)59. That was supposed to be 'can't' not 'can.' I was there for a demonstation against Nixon's bombing
Last edited Thu May 9, 2013, 11:48 AM - Edit history (1)
escalation on Cambodia so it wasn't exactly the friendliest day with the police forces.There were a hundred times more of us than these rifle toting fools as we went to Capitol to hear the Democratic speakers. Of course, we were unarmed because we were there for peace, and trained in non-violence techniques to handle anything that would occur, because things happen.
There were all kinds of police, (if IIRC, seven different kinds) on our tails the entire way until we dispersed to go home. As professional and they and the mounted police were, their presence was as strong and unavoidable as I imagine these yokels will learn there.
Tear gas was employed when some loud mouths went after the police on the fringe of the crowd. We weren't there for a pissing contest, but the police didn't put up with any crap. Those characters had bragged the night before how many times they'd been arrested and been bailed by their parents, and we avoided them like the plague. No one was going to bail us out and we were thousands of miles away from home and had jobs.
LOL at the unedited post, I often drop negatives in my sentences as I rush. It changes the meaning of the post. What I meant to say was that those cops won't be swayed by any shenanigans there.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So, an overt police response to a protest is okay if you don't like the point of the protest?
brooklynite
May 2013
#26
No, bringing guns to DC is illegal and these idiot nuts want to flex muscle
NightWatcher
May 2013
#35
It's okay to arrest anyone engaging in civil disobedience. That's kind of the point of it.
cui bono
May 2013
#44
Please start shit with the police. The police will show you teabaggers how to shoot.
muntrv
May 2013
#3
If you could see inside their homes, you'd understand the justice of their cause:
freshwest
May 2013
#17
Although that character on the right actually turned out to be pretty bad-ass.
intheflow
May 2013
#57
The baggers are brats presuming on the maturity of others to pretend to be tough.
freshwest
May 2013
#62
It won't work, though. I've been to D.C. You can't distract those police with pastry. Just sayin'
freshwest
May 2013
#41
That was supposed to be 'can't' not 'can.' I was there for a demonstation against Nixon's bombing
freshwest
May 2013
#59
I wouldn't have come back and caught it without your reply. Thanks for being nice about it..
freshwest
May 2013
#73
I think this article sums up what they are all about really well... and inadvertantly so
jeffrey_pdx
May 2013
#25
That is sad. Bet he keeps himself jacked up with paranoia inducing media all day and night.
freshwest
May 2013
#65
They don't have the guts. The march will never happen. If it does, nobody will be armed.
Dash87
May 2013
#42