General Discussion

Raine

(31,179 posts)

80. JFK wasn't the first president to be a "womanizer"

Reply to oberliner (Original post)

Tue Feb 7, 2012, 11:23 PM

Feb 2012

and he sure isn't the last, just saying.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Book details JFK affair with White House teen intern [View all] oberliner Feb 2012 OP

Here's a photo of her at the time: MineralMan Feb 2012 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author Ian David Feb 2012 #6

No comment. -10 MineralMan Feb 2012 #14

She was a debutante. kskiska Feb 2012 #21

I also attended Dorian Gray Feb 2012 #40

I cannot believe this post is still here obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #42

You're right. I'll self-delete. Sorry. n/t Ian David Feb 2012 #46

Nose and Eyes and glance remind me of Grace Kelly. Mira Feb 2012 #81

Obviously I haven't read the entire account but might we remain skeptical in fairness? Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #2

We could remain skeptical, but this has the ring of truth to it. MineralMan Feb 2012 #3

Can this really be called a consenual affair? oberliner Feb 2012 #5

I don't know. She would have been 19 at the time. MineralMan Feb 2012 #11

As oberliner noted the description does not sound consensual. Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2012 #16

Without reading her account, I couldn't say. MineralMan Feb 2012 #18

How is it not consensual??! DutchLiberal Feb 2012 #34

Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #38

Position of authority - fear of consequences oberliner Feb 2012 #74

I'm not opposed to teacher-student relationships either... DutchLiberal Feb 2012 #77

I was going to explain some of this to you... but your last sentence shows me Mira Feb 2012 #82

What is it? Shocked by the fact that men and women can enjoy sex? DutchLiberal Feb 2012 #88

What I said was neither nasty nor an accusation Mira Feb 2012 #89

Thank you. A one-sided account of something that happened half a century ago sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #67

Being "in shock" doesn't denote a consensual sexual encounter obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #43

I could have described myself as being "in shock" during and after my first sexual encounter. leeroysphitz Feb 2012 #49

Shock is what your system does when it is theatened in some way. n/t EFerrari Feb 2012 #64

Too long ago and too little information to make a judgment on this MineralMan Feb 2012 #52

That's how I see it as well. TBF Feb 2012 #56

Not necessarily, and I speak from Surya Gayatri Feb 2012 #53

A groupie who has sex with a rockstar may be "in shock" too... DutchLiberal Feb 2012 #59

Bull cookies. aquart Feb 2012 #60

Can sex between 2 people of such uneven power really be 'consentual.' ehrnst Feb 2012 #91

Which part has a "ring of truth"? girl gone mad Feb 2012 #62

Shrug. MineralMan Feb 2012 #63

If they aren't true, then great harm is being done. girl gone mad Feb 2012 #76

Lol, I was wondering that also. I'd like to a lot more about this woman before giving sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #68

The man had a severe chronic back injury FarPoint Feb 2012 #7

Thanks for the heart FarPoint Feb 2012 #13

How do you know he wasn't horny?? Manifestor_of_Light Feb 2012 #65

The hypothesis I heard was that the steroids he took made him MORE horny, not less. yellowcanine Feb 2012 #71

She's claiming that the long shadow of the affair was responsible virgogal Feb 2012 #4

I would agree. I think we need to remember that this was an era of "free sex" and it was really jwirr Feb 2012 #24

"Anything goes" in 1962? wtmusic Feb 2012 #25

Personal experience and that of friend, fellow students and neighbors. I was there. jwirr Feb 2012 #26

I was there too wtmusic Feb 2012 #27

I was there in 1962 also, but I don't remember free love kicking in for a few years after that. Arkansas Granny Feb 2012 #61

In my community they did not get contraception. They got pregnant and consequently married and jwirr Feb 2012 #78

I had the same response but I think it is in reference to a later time when the marriage broke up. yellowcanine Feb 2012 #70

That is certainly not true obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #44

Written like a Harlequin romance novel. n/t Blue_In_AK Feb 2012 #8

Actually, no, it's not Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #36

You made me laugh.. Fumesucker Feb 2012 #54

You made me laugh, too. Blue_In_AK Feb 2012 #58

I have never read one of those, and I have a bit of trouble with your casual sentence. Mira Feb 2012 #84

I didn't intend to imply that she was lying, Blue_In_AK Feb 2012 #85

OKAY then. It was flowery, I agree. Mira Feb 2012 #87

Sad if true. nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #9

And sadder if false. (n/t) Iggo Feb 2012 #15

1000% n/t sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #69

What is her motive for coming forward with this now? Peregrine Took Feb 2012 #10

Sell books. (n/t) Iggo Feb 2012 #19

Bingo! Surya Gayatri Feb 2012 #55

By the way, this book is not the first time this has MineralMan Feb 2012 #12

I really don't care how true her version of events is or isn't. What sinkingfeeling Feb 2012 #17

Couldn't agree more. From what I have read she claims they had an affair, she was sabrina 1 Feb 2012 #83

Why did she wait so long to "reveal" this? JitterbugPerfume Feb 2012 #20

Amen to that. FIFTY years later? Please. CurtEastPoint Feb 2012 #22

Sounds like just another installment of right wing tabloid BS about the Kennedys. meanit Feb 2012 #23

welcome to DU unionworks Feb 2012 #28

Thanks for the welcome meanit Feb 2012 #94

Good catch! flamingdem Feb 2012 #41

Well known that JFK was a panty chaser who would screw any attractive woman that let him. bluestate10 Feb 2012 #29

No reason not to believe it--she isn't really all that new--knowledge of her has book_worm Feb 2012 #30

So? SaintPete Feb 2012 #31

That can be said about a lot of posts here oberliner Feb 2012 #32

you're absolutely right, my bad SaintPete Feb 2012 #33

No problem oberliner Feb 2012 #39

I imagine some may reflect. Others may discuss. And still others may do further research. LanternWaste Feb 2012 #50

Nice try, I've already made peace with the OP SaintPete Feb 2012 #57

JFK was a well known serial adulterer, so obviously this is very believable. Nye Bevan Feb 2012 #35

For Pete's sake, the man's been dead for 50 years. Fla Dem Feb 2012 #37

guess what? people in positions of power (often men) use that position for sex RainDog Feb 2012 #45

It bothers me if true overall. Broderick Feb 2012 #47

This woman is clearly lying here and trying to profit from besmirching a great man. leeroysphitz Feb 2012 #48

Oh, come on. It's well-known JFK was a horndog Arugula Latte Feb 2012 #51

+1. If this was Jimmy Carter, I would be sceptical. Nye Bevan Feb 2012 #90

Please............. Beacool Feb 2012 #93

It's kinda Romance Novelly, isn't it? graywarrior Feb 2012 #66

The president! Having sex with women within these very walls.... deutsey Feb 2012 #72

JFK affair tell-all books lost their scandal shock, what, 20+ years ago?? Blue_Tires Feb 2012 #73

Character assassination of an assassinated President fifty years after a conspiracy murdered him? T S Justly Feb 2012 #75

The Posthumous Assassination of JFK Octafish Feb 2012 #79

JFK wasn't the first president to be a "womanizer" Raine Feb 2012 #80

Is this a surprise? Beacool Feb 2012 #86

This message was self-deleted by its author Obamanaut Feb 2012 #92