Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,677 posts)
11. Ok.
Fri May 10, 2013, 10:47 AM
May 2013
You say that "Getting to the outside of a secure building and spray painting it is quite a long way from getting in and removing nuclear materials". Okay then, how is 27 years behind bars a reasonable sentence for her infraction?

I rather doubt that she'll spend anything like 27 years behind bars. That's just the maximum sentence for what the jury convicted her of. She'll probably end up on the low end of the range with much of it outside of prison (perhaps all of it). She may even be able to get the sabotage charge thrown out on appeal. But your point is pretty silly. Just as there are a whole range of options for the offense, there's a whole range of possible punishments. Sentencing guidelines account for this as well. There isn't any reason to believe that she'll get the maximum sentence for her offense. Actually stealing weapons-grade material is orders of magnitude worse and there isn't any reason to believe that her punishment will match that crime.

you are equating nuclear waste / weapons grade materials, with not liking what some random person says?

Nope... and it's pretty ridiculous of you to pretend otherwise. It was just another way of saying "you can make your point... and even break the law and get arrested... without stepping over clear lines."

We have a long history of civil disobedience in this country.

Yep... which does not make just any action that you want to call civil disobedience suddenly acceptable. Chaining yourself to the gatehouse is civil disobedience. Cutting through multiple layers of security fencing protecting nuclear weapons isn't. If the third fence had been high voltage and she died trying to cross it... the facility would have nothing to apologize for.

The fact that she couldn't come up with something more appropriate form of protest certainly leaves her in the "less than creative" camp if not stupid.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k/r marmar May 2013 #1
A nun who cut through a fence to protest nukes got 21 years. Octafish May 2013 #2
indeed. nt xchrom May 2013 #3
Remember all the hoopla about illegal domestic radiation experiments on US citizens? Octafish May 2013 #13
The cold war was rough on our own citizens. Nt xchrom May 2013 #14
"Cut through a fence" ? FBaggins May 2013 #7
So why aren't the facility managers going to jail? ljm2002 May 2013 #8
Someone should be punished/fired FBaggins May 2013 #9
Brilliant. ljm2002 May 2013 #10
Ok. FBaggins May 2013 #11
You are the best. Octafish May 2013 #12
K&R abelenkpe May 2013 #4
Two sides to every story... 3. Mary Estelle Curran Mr. Blue Sky May 2013 #5
thank you n/t Psephos May 2013 #6
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»7 Financial Facts That Wi...»Reply #11