General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Occulus
(20,599 posts)In fact, I feel a little sick about it.
I'd like to point something out, here. That One was unbelieveably well-versed with every last, least, littlest particular of the ACA when it was first proposed. Immediately. Their expertise on the subject left no time period for study or familiarizing themselves with that same ocean of details, and yet, almost every post, every question, every comment, and every complaint, almost without exception, was met by That One with a long, long list of absolutely truthful, accurate, and provably true blue links. Everything- everything- That One said was 100% true.
There was too much expertise to be credible, at every hour of every day. One person, almost magically knowledgable, almost magically accurate, and almost before those same details were released? With those response times? In gaming terms, there was almost zero ping. Ha. Nobody is that good, that accurate, that knowledgeable, that perfect. Not on such a vast piece of legislation, and not to that level of detail, and certainly not so soon. But... what about a team of White House staffers? No, that's not at all credible... but That One is?
Just thought I'd point that out. "Suspicious" doesn't cover it.
I smell a rat.