In view of the global CO2 levels surpassing the 400 level

[AverageJoe90]

15. Well, your suspicions are dead wrong, sorry to say.

I don't think you're being straight up with who you are and what you really think.

Well, the truth is, I certainly have been QUITE straight up with my opinions(perhaps to the point where certain people wish I'd just disappear, I'd say).

but from time-to-time the mask slips.

So, because of ONE slight typo mistake I made in a post here(which I have since corrected, by the way!), I'm somehow this sneaky disinfo person? For shame, man, for shame.

Your speciality is greenwashing the climate issue.

I'm surprised that you would use that term, by the way: From my experience, the term "greenwashing" actually seems to be primarily used by deniers(like Tony Watts!) & anti-AGW supposed skeptics, by either mocking us, or trying to disprove research into alternative energy. And, by the way, it's never really worked, because there's just too much good research that says that alt-fuels really can be viable, and sooner than many think).

Don't believe me, btw? Take a look at these WUWT posts. There ARE deniers on the comments boards using that very term(and it's variations!)

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/04/28/lysenkoism-and-global-warming-theory/
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/04/27/hansen-unleashed-people-he-disagrees-with-are-neanderthals/
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&cad=rja&ved=0CFQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwattsupwiththat.com%2F2013%2F02%2F15%2Fopen-thread-weekend-15%2F&ei=17uNUbO5KI640QGP8IHgDg&usg=AFQjCNE7wpbEVp6V8Mv17ygUFiHyG74gTg&sig2=YUOHXJVdRGa6LUq9j02H9A

That's just a small sample, but the proof is there.