Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Beer Snob-50

(6,676 posts)

5. i was listening to a right wing catholic radio station on my in to work this am

Reply to deminks (Original post)

Wed Feb 8, 2012, 09:26 AM

Feb 2012

and this contraceptive thing is gaining traction in their little world. will it mean anything to the great majority of catholics? propbably not (my friends generally don't care about this issue).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Rethuglican lie about "coverage" of contraceptives [View all] deminks Feb 2012 OP

"Direct mammograms"? How many different excuses have they made now? DCKit Feb 2012 #1

Yeah, one of the "reasons" they stopped funding PP was they didn't actually perform the mammograms auburngrad82 Feb 2012 #3

yeah, eventually they'll object even to paying salaries in cash. they'll pay in vouchers unblock Feb 2012 #2

Sorry. That's incorrect. FBaggins Feb 2012 #4

i was listening to a right wing catholic radio station on my in to work this am Beer Snob-50 Feb 2012 #5

It only means something to 350 bishops, not to 68 million Catholics EFerrari Feb 2012 #6

thinking about this subject this am Beer Snob-50 Feb 2012 #7

These bishops need to stop practicing medicine without a license. nt EFerrari Feb 2012 #8

what makes me so goddam mad is that they dismiss the 98% of Catholics out of hand! CTyankee Feb 2012 #9

Yep. EFerrari Feb 2012 #10

It could all be solved by having insurance for everyone that is not tied to your employer. tanyev Feb 2012 #11