Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
5. I no longer see how we can win when our own go after our side time and again
Mon May 13, 2013, 06:10 AM
May 2013

U.S. Tax Authority Apologizes for Singling Out Anti-Tax Groups

May 12, 2013


Washington (dpa) - The Internal Revenue Service admitted Friday that it treated some groups associated with the anti-tax Tea Party with additional scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status as nonprofit organizations.

The US tax authority said it singled out conservative groups with "tea party" or "patriot" in their names during the 2012 presidential election campaign season.

Lois Lerner, director of tax exempt organizations for the IRS, said career employees of the agency subjected the groups to further examination based solely on their names.

"They didn't do it correctly," Lerner said Friday in Washington, according to Bloomberg news. "We would like to apologize for that."

The agency, however, said its actions weren't politically motivated.

The Tea Party is a conservative political movement that advocates reducing government spending and taxes. Its name is derived from the Boston Tea Party of 1773, a protest against British tax policies.

"Tea Party groups complained last year that they were required to provide an inordinate amount of information when they applied for tax-exempt status."

IRS problem was they poorly thought out their mission parameters

http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/2013/5/12/us_tax_authority_apologizes_for_singling.htm

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So why are you joining in the other thread with the attack on Kucinich over this? Bonobo May 2013 #1
I didn't attack him for what he said, and you know that. cali May 2013 #3
I hear you and I also am no fan of that. Bonobo May 2013 #4
Who heads up the IRS? MrSlayer May 2013 #2
A Bushie. Scuba May 2013 #21
lol BlueToTheBone May 2013 #27
I no longer see how we can win when our own go after our side time and again Katashi_itto May 2013 #5
Aw, like black voters have to require an inordinate amount of info to JUST VOTE? KittyWampus May 2013 #29
Like that makes any sense at all. Katashi_itto May 2013 #31
From your post:"Tea Party groups complained last year that they were required to provide an inordina KittyWampus May 2013 #39
And that relates to black voters how....? Katashi_itto May 2013 #40
You must not have been paying attention- Minority voters had new obstacles in registering to vote KittyWampus May 2013 #41
Nope I have been paying attention, you havent been keeping track of what going on with SCOTUS Katashi_itto May 2013 #42
Like what are you talking about? badtoworse May 2013 #35
How do you define "we"? Marr May 2013 #36
Let's see, the IRS is in charge of collecting taxes and you think it is wrong for them to FSogol May 2013 #6
+1, n/t RKP5637 May 2013 #7
grab a frickin' clue: Even if that was all they'd done, it would be WRONG in a major way. duh cali May 2013 #8
If facts are as the article states, then that's bad Xipe Totec May 2013 #24
ALL tax-exempt/charity/foundations/etc should be looked at intensely SoCalDem May 2013 #9
YES! This whole argument is being shifted to say the IRS "targeted", rather than "scrutinized" for chimpymustgo May 2013 #10
But they didn't look at all marshall May 2013 #12
I agree. the mistake is apologizing and I believe the apology was done on purpose just to give kelliekat44 May 2013 #13
Would you be OK with the DEA targeting pro-legalization groups? (nt) Nye Bevan May 2013 #15
The DEA does target pro-legalization groups... Chan790 May 2013 #20
Would I be ok with the FBI looking for the guys on the Most Wanted List? FSogol May 2013 #25
If one wanted to identify organizations that do not meet the requirements for tax exemption, Hoyt May 2013 #11
That's what I am thinking. Thank you. djean111 May 2013 #16
Yes, it's the same reason that law enforcement looks at NAMBLA a wee bit harder than other groups... Tom Ripley May 2013 #23
More Info Needed Here... KharmaTrain May 2013 #14
Agree about it possibly being a "pre-emptive strike" of further investigation KoKo May 2013 #37
A Very Good Point... KharmaTrain May 2013 #38
No, ProSense May 2013 #17
No Obama political appointees at the IRS , btw. geek tragedy May 2013 #18
The truth is that every year the IRS targets certain groups because they can't target them all. JaneyVee May 2013 #19
Makes sense... KansDem May 2013 #26
Talking Points Memo has a good short article about this non-scandal. greatlaurel May 2013 #22
why shouldn't the raison d'etre of an entity be a disqualifier for tax exemption? ellenfl May 2013 #28
DU might be screaming about it if it was the GOP Enrique May 2013 #30
"If a republican administration had done this, DU would be screaming about it..." Blue_Tires May 2013 #32
Isn't the IRS independent of the administration? sadbear May 2013 #33
Douglas Shulman, the head of the IRS at the time was a bush43 plant madokie May 2013 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ugh. More information ab...»Reply #5