Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(62,444 posts)

3. That seems to be covered

Mon May 13, 2013, 06:57 AM

May 2013

"men who smoke only marijuana actually lower their risk"

One would presume that "lower their risk" is in relation to men who smoke nothing.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Study: Frequent marijuana use tied to reduced bladder cancer risk [View all] RainDog May 2013 OP

And what about non-smokers? nt kelliekat44 May 2013 #1

It seems the study was looking at cigarette vs. cannabis RainDog May 2013 #2

That seems to be covered jberryhill May 2013 #3

Hence my use of the word "seems" jberryhill May 2013 #8

The non-smokers would not be a control group RainDog May 2013 #11

If marijuana was discovered today it would be hailed as a miracle. Scuba May 2013 #5

And patented, and sold only through prescription, thucythucy May 2013 #6

this ^^^^^^ angel823 May 2013 #9

That's why former "Drug Czars" are lobbying for Sativex RainDog May 2013 #10