Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Magistrate

(96,043 posts)
20. Nice Bit Of Cherry Picking Yourself, Sir
Mon May 13, 2013, 03:34 PM
May 2013

The article goes on to state that the cut-off point of 1997 was not chosen but imposed by limitations on CDC data; said limitations being imposed by the political ( read money ) influence of the NRA, an organization you proudly pay membership dues to, which wishes there to be no public health data available with government imprimature on the health risks of gun ownership, both to persons who own guns as a class and to society as a whole.

The relation pointed out, of course, holds true even as gun deaths decline, along with a general decline in violent crime: where in locales where more guns are present, more people are shot than are shot in locales where fewer guns are present. It was this relation which the study demonstrated from existing data, rather than, as you pretend, a simple claim greater numbers of guns mean more deaths over-all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

When you cherry pick your data to only cover the peak in gun violence hack89 May 2013 #1
As an NRA member, surely you're aware that not every gunshot wound kills. Robb May 2013 #2
But the good doctor is talking about deaths, isn't he? hack89 May 2013 #3
You're *proud* of being in the NRA. Robb May 2013 #4
So I take it you support the doctor's deception hack89 May 2013 #5
Why do you belong to the NRA? Robb May 2013 #6
Gun ownership is not incompatible with being a Democrat hack89 May 2013 #7
No, but belonging to the NRA is. Robb May 2013 #8
Cultural wars it is hack89 May 2013 #10
This is a site for Democrats and Progressives. Robb May 2013 #11
I am a liberal Democrat hack89 May 2013 #12
Yet you belong to the NRA. Robb May 2013 #15
You really yearn for a simple black and white world, don't you? hack89 May 2013 #18
You support a group that works to get Democrats out of office. Robb May 2013 #22
Fixating on one thing to the exclusion of others hack89 May 2013 #24
Nutty me, I'm "fixated" on electing FEWER Republicans. Robb May 2013 #25
Which is worse then... sarisataka May 2013 #31
*Claims* to vote DemocratIC. Robb May 2013 #35
I was not speaking of the other poster specifically sarisataka May 2013 #38
Hard to tell with your desire to relive the AWB and the 1994 election hack89 May 2013 #33
You still haven't explained your NRA membership. Robb May 2013 #36
I have publically advocated for gun control measures hack89 May 2013 #39
Why do you belong to the NRA? Robb May 2013 #41
Pissing you off would be an excellent reason to join. hack89 May 2013 #44
Really. You joined to piss off liberals. Robb May 2013 #46
Not liberals - just you. hack89 May 2013 #48
Why do you hide the reason you belong to the NRA? Robb May 2013 #53
This post was alerted on. The jury voted 6/0 to let it stand. ohiosmith May 2013 #26
So was this one, using the same argument by probably same alerter. Results were 2-4 LEAVE IT hobbit709 May 2013 #29
No doubt! ohiosmith May 2013 #30
Lots of alerts flying out of this thread, it seems (this one goes to Post #5) petronius May 2013 #34
You mean like "Good Guys with Guns" and "Bad Guys with Guns"? Tommy_Carcetti May 2013 #59
No - I don't mean that at all. nt hack89 May 2013 #61
There are no liberal Democrats in the NRA. nt G_j May 2013 #32
You know, really? oldhippie May 2013 #13
hack89 said he was an NRA member. Robb May 2013 #16
Furthering my point ..... oldhippie May 2013 #17
You want to send money to support GOP candidates? Robb May 2013 #23
Bugs ya, don't it? oldhippie May 2013 #40
Good god Robb CokeMachine May 2013 #51
I got a year for free OriginalGeek May 2013 #28
The NRA might be the best known gun club, but it's not the only one. Neoma May 2013 #9
Come on, what's wrong with using a study that ended about 15 years ago? hughee99 May 2013 #19
Nice Bit Of Cherry Picking Yourself, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #20
The good doctor could have used FBI data hack89 May 2013 #21
That Would Not Have Altered It In The Slightest, Sir, As You Know Perfectly Well The Magistrate May 2013 #27
"Public health concern" - bulls eye. hack89 May 2013 #37
Public Health Solutions, Sir, Tend To Include Restrictions On Dangerous Substances The Magistrate May 2013 #42
I can walk out of Home Depot with an arm load of chemicals hack89 May 2013 #45
Noted In The Comment You Are Replying To, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #47
The mental health aspect is what I was really referring to hack89 May 2013 #49
It is Part Of The Mental Health Question, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #52
Like in Chicago where all of those things are banned? rl6214 May 2013 #14
The more guns there are in all, the more easily they can be illegally obtained. nomorenomore08 May 2013 #43
that might work for the NRA BainsBane May 2013 #50
The suburbs? Try the state. rl6214 May 2013 #55
so are you saying you don't even know that BainsBane May 2013 #56
I wouldn't know, I don't belong to the NRA rl6214 May 2013 #57
Chicago! CARS!!! KNIVES!!! 2nd AMENDMENT!!!!!!!!! Skittles May 2013 #58
Thank god for the NRA and those who support them, directly or indirectly. Hoyt May 2013 #54
The pediataricians wonder why the statistics .. ananda May 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"There are more women dyi...»Reply #20