Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]Ptah
(34,107 posts)97. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Mail Message
At Tue May 14, 2013, 05:42 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
I have no problem with the IRS going after those openly advocating tax evation.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022836343
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
This post is a TOS violation and a grave embarrassment to DU. To associate liberals, progressives and Democrats with illegal actions and abuses of power condemned clearly and unambiguously by our President makes one wonder if the poster is not intentionally trying to make progressives and Democrats look authoritarian and anti-democratic and hostile to basic American values. The very suggestion that progressives and Democrats support singling out anyone for the political beliefs is so hostile to our values and liberals and progressives values - I wonder about the agenda of this poster. Think about how right now people of all persuasion might come across this OP and think that Democrats and Progressives are in fact authoritarians who do not share values which accept the right of everyone to express their opinions without an worry of persecution, discrimination or even subtle intimidation. The assumption of a neutral state apparatus is fundamental. Please, please send a message loud a clear that the members of DU will not accept authoritarianism or endorse political intimidation no matter who does it and who it is directed against. For the respectability of the progressive cause, the Democratic Party and this forum - please hide this post and let us send the message that was once invoked in the immortal words of the great French Philosopher Voltaire, "I disagree with every word you say, but I would die for the right of you to say it," Please let everyone know that is the position of liberals, progressives and Democrats and the position of DU,
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Tue May 14, 2013, 05:53 AM, and the Jury voted 1-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: Devilgrrl doesn't understand what the IRS did and how it violates their own rules.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: You may be reading a wee bit too much into that statement.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The alerter needs to read the post alerted on.
Tax evasion is a crime.
Those that advocate crime should be investigated.
The alerter wasted a rant.
Leave it.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have no problem with the IRS targeting *any* organization whose positions belie a disposition...
Chan790
May 2013
#58
I want to see Mitt Romney and his ilk broke, penniless, discredited and in prison.
gordianot
May 2013
#14
Yep. Ed Schultz is doing a pretty good job of explaining what is probably going on.
GoCubsGo
May 2013
#30
Just like you have no problem with the DEA targeting medical mj facilities, right? n/t
X_Digger
May 2013
#18
Tax exempt political organizations should not exist -- the loophole for the rich should be closed
FarCenter
May 2013
#19
I wonder what the response would be here if it were the left that were being targeted.
AngryOldDem
May 2013
#95
These groups were openly advocating tax evation (sic)? Where are your examples?
DesMoinesDem
May 2013
#29
Just because YOU are ignorant of something and too lazy to google it doesn't mean it isn't a fact.
DesMoinesDem
May 2013
#47
Straw man argument. Provide an example of a group OPENLY ADVOCATING tax evasion.
DesMoinesDem
May 2013
#68
Openly advocating something and secretly (or openly) doing something aren't anywhere close
DesMoinesDem
May 2013
#70
so did they "go after" / audit these groups, or just examine their tax-exempt status more carefully?
renate
May 2013
#32
Republics will squeal like stuck pigs when government looks into the shenanigans of their tax exempt
indepat
May 2013
#57
PLEASE!! You are disgracing the Progressive cause, The Democratic Party and this forum
Douglas Carpenter
May 2013
#88
I don't know of any evidence that is the case. The President as I mentioned who is the expo facto
Douglas Carpenter
May 2013
#103
This kind of idiocy will make it impossible for the IRS to go after Churches that endorse candidates
brooklynite
May 2013
#101
this is a huge setback for any attempts to restrain dirty money in politics. For a long time to come
Douglas Carpenter
May 2013
#105