Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT editorial: Time for Obama 'to abandon his hopes of reaching a grand budget bargain' with GOP [View all]MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)107. Sigh.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/04/15/david-frum-on-obama-lessons-in-robert-caro-s-lyndon-johnson.html
Johnson led the nation in its mourning for Kennedy, opening his first speech to Congress: All I have I would have gladly given not to be standing here today. Then he picked one out the late presidents many fitfully advanced causes and seized on that cause as the one and only fitting memorial. Johnson chose civil rightshis passion much more than it had ever been Kennedys. [No] eulogy could more eloquently honor President Kennedys memory than the earliest possible passage of the civil-rights bill for which he fought so long. Unsaid: Kennedy had to fight so long for that bill because he did not fight anywhere near so effectively as the man who followed him.
...
Having chosen his cause, Johnson started to assert his authority. The conservative Democrats who dominated Congress in the early 1960s had perceived Kennedy as weak. They pushed against himand usually won. Within days of taking office, Johnson went looking for a way to push back. He found his opportunity in a battle over grain exports to the Soviet Union. Conservatives in Congress had introduced an amendment limiting presidential authority to permit such sales.
As Caro writes: I hope that [bill] gets murdered, Johnson snarled, and, sitting in the Oval Office, he kept telephoning senator after senator, cajoling, bullying, threatening, charming, long after he had the majority, to make the vote overwhelming. Why? To teach Congress the lesson that Johnson could not be rolled.
The lesson was learned.
Johnson led the nation in its mourning for Kennedy, opening his first speech to Congress: All I have I would have gladly given not to be standing here today. Then he picked one out the late presidents many fitfully advanced causes and seized on that cause as the one and only fitting memorial. Johnson chose civil rightshis passion much more than it had ever been Kennedys. [No] eulogy could more eloquently honor President Kennedys memory than the earliest possible passage of the civil-rights bill for which he fought so long. Unsaid: Kennedy had to fight so long for that bill because he did not fight anywhere near so effectively as the man who followed him.
...
Having chosen his cause, Johnson started to assert his authority. The conservative Democrats who dominated Congress in the early 1960s had perceived Kennedy as weak. They pushed against himand usually won. Within days of taking office, Johnson went looking for a way to push back. He found his opportunity in a battle over grain exports to the Soviet Union. Conservatives in Congress had introduced an amendment limiting presidential authority to permit such sales.
As Caro writes: I hope that [bill] gets murdered, Johnson snarled, and, sitting in the Oval Office, he kept telephoning senator after senator, cajoling, bullying, threatening, charming, long after he had the majority, to make the vote overwhelming. Why? To teach Congress the lesson that Johnson could not be rolled.
The lesson was learned.
etc.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
NYT editorial: Time for Obama 'to abandon his hopes of reaching a grand budget bargain' with GOP [View all]
Newsjock
May 2013
OP
I think that when you reach across the aisle you're not supposed to pump so vigorously
Dragonfli
May 2013
#16
If the majority of Americans just wanted the two parties to funtion as one...
FiveGoodMen
May 2013
#81
Obama's peeps will be heartbroken, they have invested so much propaganda pimping for him
Dragonfli
May 2013
#15
His "real game" is not evil. It just isn't what we thought we were voting for.
BlueStreak
May 2013
#80
thank you for saying this. I want some extra credit. haha It is a totally
Laura PourMeADrink
May 2013
#88
And forget everything he has tried to do for the last 4 years to cooperate with the Repubs?
kentuck
May 2013
#37
Be interesting to see how LBJ or FDR would have handled this bunch. Clinton not so much, but maybe
maddiemom
May 2013
#48
I thought this was the point that House Republicans just want the Obama Budget to go away...
nenagh
May 2013
#36
The SS "compromise" is to be found in Obama's new book. "The Audacity of Surrender".
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2013
#44
To be followed up with "The Catastrophy of Surrender" co-written by elderly street people. n/t
L0oniX
May 2013
#59
When we hit rock bottom we will be unrepresented slaves with no civil rights
FiveGoodMen
May 2013
#83
The Class War isnt between the two parties. Both Parties are controlled by the Elite Class.
rhett o rick
May 2013
#53
The republican office holders are draconian. However, they only represent the 20. 80% don't agree
graham4anything
May 2013
#76