Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
9. As someone who spent my entire working life on the road who likes his liquor, I'm torn
Tue May 14, 2013, 04:54 PM
May 2013

I've seen the deterioration of driving skills in general over the last few decades. The cars are now so easy to drive that the only thing that I can put my finger on as a cause is lack of attention and distraction. If the average driver I see on the roads is any indication any reduction in BAC is welcome but I doubt it will have even a modest effect.

As someone who likes his liquor, I don't think BAC is a hard and fast measure of impairment or inability to drive safely. I and others I have known have over the years driven safely at well above the legal limit. There are many factors that affect your ability to function at varied levels of blood alcohol content.
What is your competency performing the skill at a baseline?
How accustomed are you to perform at a competent level while being impaired no matter the cause?
How familiar are you with the condition of impairment to judge your ability?

I doubt that there's anyone reading this that can't think of at least one news story of someone doing outrageous things with a BAC of two or three times the legal limit. On the other side of the argument are the stories of someone pulled over at a sobriety checkpoint and charged with DUI while they were operating the vehicle safely and competently.

Following the precautionary principle would suggest that no level of impairment is acceptable but there are people I would not share the road with if they were stone-cold sober.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"We need a way for courts and police forces to start collecting more revenue" -- NTSB villager May 2013 #1
Exactly what this is about Aerows May 2013 #14
Bull DJ13 May 2013 #2
No way I'm going to defend drinking and driving and I rarely drink at all... hlthe2b May 2013 #3
They Need The Money SoCalMusicLover May 2013 #4
Amusingly, I blow about that nearly all the time. Robb May 2013 #5
Can I breathe what exhale by convection? The Straight Story May 2013 #6
If only I could heat my house with it. Robb May 2013 #8
With this, a lot of people will be guilty of DUI after just one glass of wine. backscatter712 May 2013 #7
As someone who spent my entire working life on the road who likes his liquor, I'm torn tech3149 May 2013 #9
Talking on a cell phone Aerows May 2013 #20
Bullshit! More money for the police and lawyers! n-t Logical May 2013 #10
Back in the mid to late 80s, when the limits were between .12 and .15 ... ieoeja May 2013 #11
This is a very lucrative revenue stream, and as such, must be expanded. n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #12
I can legally pilot an airplane at < .04. n/t cloudbase May 2013 #13
meanwhile there are people driving on every med G_j May 2013 #15
Or blabbing on a cell phone Aerows May 2013 #18
And texting. n/t RiffRandell May 2013 #23
I'd prefer that they make Aerows May 2013 #16
Personally, I can't wait for the Google self-driving car to be viable LondonReign2 May 2013 #17
they must not of talked to the police unions Mosby May 2013 #19
It's okay for them Aerows May 2013 #22
Complete bullshit. RiffRandell May 2013 #21
I think restaurant/bar associations will stop it markiv May 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Blood Alcohol Limit For D...»Reply #9