Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
28. I don't know about un-American,
Tue May 14, 2013, 11:40 PM
May 2013

but they damn sure don't seem to care about all of the innocent people who are victims of gun violence on a daily basis. All that is ultimately important to LaPierre and his minions in Congress who are blocking gun laws is money.
When you compare the rate of gun violence in areas abroad vs. the U.S. , it's really easy to feel depressed about how these people are holding us back from becoming a safer nation. For instance, I saw one article that said that London can go for weeks without a single shooting, and London happens to be a rather large city. I'll bet that in many of America's cities, the monthly gun murder rate exceeds that of London in an entire year.
Is it too much to ask for some gun laws so that our murder rate can be as low as theirs (or lower)?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'm about as anti gun as most but what is wrong with resisting tyranny newmember May 2013 #1
Agreed. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #2
I don't know if the OP intended to imply that but yeah...fuck the NRA newmember May 2013 #8
It depends. If you start shooting/harming innocent people in your quest for power. . . . . . . Hoyt May 2013 #12
Then it's just murder newmember May 2013 #16
And who is going to enforce that if the right wingers initiate a war against what they perceive as Hoyt May 2013 #17
You are preaching to the choir here with me newmember May 2013 #18
Yep - like White Southerners who resisted Northern Tyranny after the Civil War el_bryanto May 2013 #4
agree 100% with your post newmember May 2013 #6
You're right and I am furious mountain grammy May 2013 #25
Why are you un persuadable on using firearms premium May 2013 #3
I had the same question. NaturalHigh May 2013 #27
Was power "orderly transfered" from the British Crown? Megalo_Man May 2013 #5
Thank You For The Laugh, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #7
No, thank YOU! Megalo_Man May 2013 #10
Good Luck With That, Sir The Magistrate May 2013 #11
As it happens, yes, this is a myth Demo_Chris May 2013 #31
I have never been a member of the NRA. Jenoch May 2013 #9
They damn sure tried in the last election, and their leadership are the worst of right wingers. Hoyt May 2013 #13
There was no 'transition of power', Jenoch May 2013 #14
No help from NRA and right wing gun lovers. Hoyt May 2013 #15
I am aware that the NRA supports Jenoch May 2013 #20
As long as yahoos ain't trying to "transition" into power by their guns, who cares. Hoyt May 2013 #21
Words have meaning. Jenoch May 2013 #26
How did the NRA attempt to impede the transition of power? premium May 2013 #23
Pretty much same. Kind of like gunners stuck on gun nomenclature. Hoyt May 2013 #24
Well, I guess you won't mind hearing it one more time. Megalo_Man May 2013 #29
They both feed bullets into the guns yahoos drool over. No difference in function. Hoyt May 2013 #32
I just explained the difference in function to you. Megalo_Man May 2013 #33
Typical gun cultist obfuscation. Heard it a thousand times. Don't care because Hoyt May 2013 #34
OK, gotcha. Enjoy your ignorance. Megalo_Man May 2013 #35
You should start a Committee of Un-American activities Riftaxe May 2013 #19
Actually, the author says "yes and no" is the answer. aikoaiko May 2013 #22
Of course not. Hell, read the last paragraph. Megalo_Man May 2013 #30
I don't know about un-American, Jamaal510 May 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is the N.R.A. Un-American...»Reply #28