General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama will soon be reaping the harvest he sowed by not pursuing the Bush Admin. criminals [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)position on issues onto others? Here is an example of what I mean:
If the same court ruled for Gore, you would not say they broke the law
My position on the SC interfering in an election is that it is anti-Constitutional, regardless of who benefits from that illegal decision. Next time ask before you wrongfully assume things.
I noticed you are ignoring the main culprits in the Iran Contra scandal in order to distract from the issue. North was merely a puppet and not a very smart one. Lower level operative who could have been used as a witness in what should have been a major prosecution of the main criminals. It didn't happen so we are where we are.
Clinton allowed them off the hook, deciding to 'move forward' and that was a fatal mistake.
The SC committed treason in 2000 and it would not matter on whose behalf they did so. To those of us who care more about this country than about individual politicians.