Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

karynnj

(60,976 posts)
13. I was surprised recently to read that at some point in the past, every town
Wed May 15, 2013, 06:05 PM
May 2013

had 1 representative - no matter how big or small they were.


Until the mid-1960s Vermont’s constitution specified that each town, regardless of its population, had one representative in the House. Burlington’s sole House member represented more people than the 107 representatives from the 107 smallest towns. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1962 that “one town, one vote” apportionment violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and in 1964 the Vermont Supreme Court came to the same decision in the case of Buckley vs. Hoff. A year later Vermont’s legislators passed a plan for reapportionment, which cut the number of House members from 246 to 150.


http://www.freedomandunity.org/vt_transition/power_shifts.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

YAY! Finally, someone is saying no!!! YAY!!! Squinch May 2013 #1
This is totally a tangent but LondonReign2 May 2013 #2
OTOH? texshelters May 2013 #6
On The Other Hand LondonReign2 May 2013 #7
Doh! texshelters May 2013 #22
Common in the Northeast. NutmegYankee May 2013 #11
I was surprised recently to read that at some point in the past, every town karynnj May 2013 #13
Go Vermont! City Lights May 2013 #3
Genetically modified food is so incredibly wonderful Addison May 2013 #4
!!! bvar22 May 2013 #5
As a proud Californian eissa May 2013 #8
Ben & Jerry's, Bernie Sanders and this. Greybnk48 May 2013 #19
Most food is derived from genetically modified organisms FarCenter May 2013 #9
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing zipplewrath May 2013 #17
well, it's alive, but barely. cali May 2013 #10
oh G_j May 2013 #12
Oh, I think the Senate will pass it next year cali May 2013 #14
Has anyone ever called Monsanto's bluff before? I hope they do. That last thing Monsanto wants sabrina 1 May 2013 #15
hey, sabrina. nice to see you. cali May 2013 #16
we're so proud of Vermont! G_j May 2013 #20
Excellent Berlum May 2013 #18
Way to be sane Vermont! You might be the only one in the Union but keep it up. TheKentuckian May 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's On! Vermont Vs. Mons...»Reply #13