Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Pentagon Unilaterally Grants Itself Authority Over ‘Civil Disturbances' [View all]leveymg
(36,418 posts)11. Here's what appears to be the gist of it. Authorizes local commanders to take action without orders
in the event of emergencies:
g. Federal military commanders, Heads of DoD Components, and/or responsible DoDcivilian officials (hereafter referred to collectively as DoD officials) have IMMEDIATERESPONSE AUTHORITY as described in this Directive. In response to a request for assistancefrom a civil authority, under imminently serious conditions and if time does not permit approvalfrom higher authority, DoD officials may provide an immediate response by temporarilyemploying the resources under their control, subject to any supplemental direction provided byhigher headquarters, to save lives, prevent human suffering, or mitigate great property damagewithin the United States. Immediate response authority does not permit actions that wouldsubject civilians to the use of military power that is regulatory, prescriptive, proscriptive, or compulsory.
I guess this, like anything, can be misconstrued, but the last sentence seems to suggest that any 2nd Lieutenant can't declare martial law and issue orders to civilians to do stuff they don't want to.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Pentagon Unilaterally Grants Itself Authority Over ‘Civil Disturbances' [View all]
appal_jack
May 2013
OP
It is distrubing and people even here were cheering this on......you have no rights.
bowens43
May 2013
#1
The link in the article is to US Code as of January 2012. Three things wrong with this:
leveymg
May 2013
#2
Please show one, ONE time in this nation's history that the military arbitrarily decided to
Ikonoklast
May 2013
#8
There have been emergency plans in place that deal with a catastrophic event such as this since the
Ikonoklast
May 2013
#16
That's brazenly untrue, that nothing is new. Of course it's something new.
woo me with science
May 2013
#17
There have ALWAYS been plans that included the military in case of catastrophe.
Ikonoklast
May 2013
#22
Your arguments here should embarrass you, but especially that last gem of a post.
woo me with science
May 2013
#35
Before posting this, I investigated whether it was nuttery or not. I think it's legit.
appal_jack
May 2013
#4
You're on the right track and thanks for posting. The militarization of the local police function is
byeya
May 2013
#12
The Final Rule was published in the Federal Register 4/12 with effective date of 5/13/13
pinboy3niner
May 2013
#10