Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Trans-Vaginal Ultrasound is NOT a 'jelly on the belly' sonogram. [View all]Withywindle
(9,989 posts)23. Yeah, that's pretty much exactly what it is.
Rape with an object is still rape.
Especially revolting when you consider how many women seeking abortions got pregnant in the first place BECAUSE of rape, or sexual abuse, or are basically children, etc., and will be traumatized and violated further for no good reason at all except to make them feel worse about themselves and their choices in a bad situation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So essentially they have legalized rape by device as long as the woman has an unwanted pregnancy?
YellowRubberDuckie
Feb 2012
#6
LOL! I'm not in Texas but I would gladly fly down to help you whip some asses if tht is FORCIBLY
Ecumenist
Feb 2012
#48
My cervical cancer was treated in a teaching hospital, usually with a large audience
REP
Feb 2012
#35
Yeah, that's very true, but they don't care about embryonic or fetal development.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#14
If a woman isn't very far along, she probably wouldn't be able to see much on a regular ultrasound
Nikia
Feb 2012
#26
when i had my oldest son, they had to onitor him. i am sure it was not exactly the same but
seabeyond
Feb 2012
#39