Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
58. Well, one point I do understand:
Wed May 15, 2013, 08:11 PM
May 2013

She may have been born there - but I was going off what you said (immigrant culture).

If they are immigrants, no, not second class citizens - but if your religion is that important to you and the public schools there have rules you should consider that before moving to someplace else.

We can find all sorts of what ifs with students and religions and their beliefs, but the schools are not religious based institutions. The coach/teacher they have and pay for is a male one. And as far as 'if someone was born a certain way' that is not a choice.

I feel for the girl in this case - but not the parents who want the education system there to change for choices they are making and the position it has put their daughter in.

"Integration comes before religion, according to the country’s supreme court."

I don't think that is unreasonable.

" The court also referred to the fact that the school had provided separate lessons for boys and girls.
As the girl could already swim she needed to have no physical contact with the male teacher."


No physical contact, once every 5 weeks, and the lessons were mandated by the courts.

They said this did not allow their pubescent daughter to swim under the gaze of a male teacher – even if she was wearing a body-concealing swimsuit.

So it boils down to - a man cannot watch her swim even in something that covered her whole body but males could teach other subjects?



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think it is nerve when people come to a country (any country) and don't learn to adapt to southernyankeebelle May 2013 #1
Yep,, if you don't like secular laws... awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #3
Not just religion. I think when you move to a new country you need to adapt to the southernyankeebelle May 2013 #8
If I moved to a country with Sharia law, I still wouldn't become a misogynist. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #10
I am not really talking about religion. southernyankeebelle May 2013 #12
I agree with your views 100% byeya May 2013 #48
thank you. Your really really smart. LOL southernyankeebelle May 2013 #50
I don't see anywhere in the article KatyMan May 2013 #35
No. I was talking in general terms. Not just religious people. southernyankeebelle May 2013 #38
Um the story doesn't say she immigrated or is a foreigner FreeState May 2013 #40
I am talking in general. A few comments ago. I don't care where she was born. All southernyankeebelle May 2013 #47
I understand your point, but there's a little more to the story than that, I think. antigone382 May 2013 #61
You make excellent points that I can't disagree with. But saying that you also must southernyankeebelle May 2013 #62
Sure, I think a certain amount of adaptation is inevitable. antigone382 May 2013 #63
Centuries ago, people generally didn't know how to swim, even sailors. dimbear May 2013 #2
You'd be surprised how many people can't swim in the US today Fumesucker May 2013 #4
i never learned and i'm from so cal JI7 May 2013 #6
That's why everyone should have swimming lessons. Dash87 May 2013 #17
I don't swim and will never learn. Skidmore May 2013 #22
article states she could already swim. n/t KatyMan May 2013 #36
I'd like to see the decision. rug May 2013 #5
it was based on integration of foreigners being more important than religious beliefs JI7 May 2013 #7
I'd still like to see it. rug May 2013 #13
how is it a public safety issue ? JI7 May 2013 #14
The state may consider the ability to swim to be basic. rug May 2013 #16
yes, that would be the point of having the lessons itself but the court ruled JI7 May 2013 #20
Here's a translation by your state.gov: Call Me Wesley May 2013 #27
Danke mein Freund. rug May 2013 #28
Gern geschehen! Call Me Wesley May 2013 #29
I wonder how this case would come out in the United States. Jim Lane May 2013 #9
that's because the US culture is much more religious and you see exceptions made JI7 May 2013 #15
There was US case law to the effect that treestar May 2013 #19
There is U.S. case law (and statutory law) both ways. Jim Lane May 2013 #32
That's within the church itself; nothing the government is doing treestar May 2013 #33
Your distinction doesn't hold water. Jim Lane May 2013 #42
True, but discrimination is a civil rather than criminal matter treestar May 2013 #43
Jesus christ on a dodge ball joint fundies are stupid... snooper2 May 2013 #11
So, what are they going to do if she refuses? Imprison her? Banish her to Arizona? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #18
she wont complete her school requirements to move on to the next level JI7 May 2013 #21
I would think an accomodation could be reached allowing her to take private lessons. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #23
no, integration is more important than religious beliefs JI7 May 2013 #25
hey, let's accomodate all fundamentalists. Say, some kid's family cali May 2013 #30
I don't think you understand multiculturalism jessie04 May 2013 #44
Nope. Call Me Wesley May 2013 #31
Mid 'seventies, USA. Our high school implemented co-ed swimming classes. hunter May 2013 #24
This sort of thing seems to pop up regularly in Europe War Horse May 2013 #26
Good. nt Demo_Chris May 2013 #34
In a land with so many lakes, it would be wise to learn how to swim. smirkymonkey May 2013 #37
There is religious freedom, then the REAL WORLD. N/t alp227 May 2013 #39
If you live in Europe, you ought to be tolerant of secular values. tritsofme May 2013 #41
I guess I will never understand burnodo May 2013 #45
Near as I can see leftynyc May 2013 #46
I tend to agree with that burnodo May 2013 #52
That is complicated leftynyc May 2013 #53
Roman Catholic woman have to (had to?) cover their hair while at mass. A hat or scarf would do. byeya May 2013 #49
Fifty years ago it was considered a sign of respect for the seriousness of the occasion; pnwmom May 2013 #54
A lot of fundy Muslim men are really into Ninjas snooper2 May 2013 #51
I guess I'm the only one who finds anything wrong with this. Nine May 2013 #55
Well The Straight Story May 2013 #56
You're proving my point for me. Nine May 2013 #57
Well, one point I do understand: The Straight Story May 2013 #58
Integration, not education Nine May 2013 #59
“parallel societies” The Straight Story May 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(Switzerland) Muslim girl...»Reply #58