Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

antigone382

(3,682 posts)
61. I understand your point, but there's a little more to the story than that, I think.
Wed May 15, 2013, 09:11 PM
May 2013

It is easy for me to say that I wouldn't move to a country with a very different culture, because as it happens I have decent economic opportunity in my country, and in most of the countries that are similar to mine (Western countries). For most people in the world, that isn't the case, and a lot of that has to do with the West colonizing other countries, a process which destroyed their economies in ways that still matter today, and also one in which a lot of their culture was destroyed and replaced with "superior" Western culture.

I mean, for example, we ourselves are typing at each other on the soil of Native Peoples whose cultures were almost totally destroyed, along with their lives, and replaced with a Western European one. I have a friend who is an illegal immigrant from Mexico who speaks fluent Mayan, as have her ancestors who have been on this continent for twelve thousand years. Between the two of us, should she conform to my culture or should I conform to hers?

Basically, the point I'm making is that a lot of people have to leave the cultures where they are comfortable, whether they want to or not, because they cannot make a living there. A lot of that has to do with centuries of the West forcing economic norms (which are one aspect of cultural norms) on these people and places, to the extent that many of them have no choice but to come here. That being the case, it isn't really fair to act as if they are privileged to come to our countries and ought to show their appreciation by conforming to our cultures. They are here oftentimes because of a history of deprivation in their own countries that is caused by us.

But even if immigrants do have opportunity in their own countries, or even if the lack of opportunity they experience isn't our fault, to another extent people have always moved from place to place, bringing their culture with them, and along with that bringing conflict with the cultures already in the area. Most every religion practiced today has some syncretic elements (meaning it is a combination of a religion that someone else brought to a place, and whatever religion or religions were already practiced there), and the same goes for language, clothing, and almost any other aspect of culture. We all adapt to each other, and based on archaeological evidence we always have.

Anyway, I don't mean this to sound like a lecture at you, you just got me thinking about a lot of things.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think it is nerve when people come to a country (any country) and don't learn to adapt to southernyankeebelle May 2013 #1
Yep,, if you don't like secular laws... awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #3
Not just religion. I think when you move to a new country you need to adapt to the southernyankeebelle May 2013 #8
If I moved to a country with Sharia law, I still wouldn't become a misogynist. Donald Ian Rankin May 2013 #10
I am not really talking about religion. southernyankeebelle May 2013 #12
I agree with your views 100% byeya May 2013 #48
thank you. Your really really smart. LOL southernyankeebelle May 2013 #50
I don't see anywhere in the article KatyMan May 2013 #35
No. I was talking in general terms. Not just religious people. southernyankeebelle May 2013 #38
Um the story doesn't say she immigrated or is a foreigner FreeState May 2013 #40
I am talking in general. A few comments ago. I don't care where she was born. All southernyankeebelle May 2013 #47
I understand your point, but there's a little more to the story than that, I think. antigone382 May 2013 #61
You make excellent points that I can't disagree with. But saying that you also must southernyankeebelle May 2013 #62
Sure, I think a certain amount of adaptation is inevitable. antigone382 May 2013 #63
Centuries ago, people generally didn't know how to swim, even sailors. dimbear May 2013 #2
You'd be surprised how many people can't swim in the US today Fumesucker May 2013 #4
i never learned and i'm from so cal JI7 May 2013 #6
That's why everyone should have swimming lessons. Dash87 May 2013 #17
I don't swim and will never learn. Skidmore May 2013 #22
article states she could already swim. n/t KatyMan May 2013 #36
I'd like to see the decision. rug May 2013 #5
it was based on integration of foreigners being more important than religious beliefs JI7 May 2013 #7
I'd still like to see it. rug May 2013 #13
how is it a public safety issue ? JI7 May 2013 #14
The state may consider the ability to swim to be basic. rug May 2013 #16
yes, that would be the point of having the lessons itself but the court ruled JI7 May 2013 #20
Here's a translation by your state.gov: Call Me Wesley May 2013 #27
Danke mein Freund. rug May 2013 #28
Gern geschehen! Call Me Wesley May 2013 #29
I wonder how this case would come out in the United States. Jim Lane May 2013 #9
that's because the US culture is much more religious and you see exceptions made JI7 May 2013 #15
There was US case law to the effect that treestar May 2013 #19
There is U.S. case law (and statutory law) both ways. Jim Lane May 2013 #32
That's within the church itself; nothing the government is doing treestar May 2013 #33
Your distinction doesn't hold water. Jim Lane May 2013 #42
True, but discrimination is a civil rather than criminal matter treestar May 2013 #43
Jesus christ on a dodge ball joint fundies are stupid... snooper2 May 2013 #11
So, what are they going to do if she refuses? Imprison her? Banish her to Arizona? Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #18
she wont complete her school requirements to move on to the next level JI7 May 2013 #21
I would think an accomodation could be reached allowing her to take private lessons. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #23
no, integration is more important than religious beliefs JI7 May 2013 #25
hey, let's accomodate all fundamentalists. Say, some kid's family cali May 2013 #30
I don't think you understand multiculturalism jessie04 May 2013 #44
Nope. Call Me Wesley May 2013 #31
Mid 'seventies, USA. Our high school implemented co-ed swimming classes. hunter May 2013 #24
This sort of thing seems to pop up regularly in Europe War Horse May 2013 #26
Good. nt Demo_Chris May 2013 #34
In a land with so many lakes, it would be wise to learn how to swim. smirkymonkey May 2013 #37
There is religious freedom, then the REAL WORLD. N/t alp227 May 2013 #39
If you live in Europe, you ought to be tolerant of secular values. tritsofme May 2013 #41
I guess I will never understand burnodo May 2013 #45
Near as I can see leftynyc May 2013 #46
I tend to agree with that burnodo May 2013 #52
That is complicated leftynyc May 2013 #53
Roman Catholic woman have to (had to?) cover their hair while at mass. A hat or scarf would do. byeya May 2013 #49
Fifty years ago it was considered a sign of respect for the seriousness of the occasion; pnwmom May 2013 #54
A lot of fundy Muslim men are really into Ninjas snooper2 May 2013 #51
I guess I'm the only one who finds anything wrong with this. Nine May 2013 #55
Well The Straight Story May 2013 #56
You're proving my point for me. Nine May 2013 #57
Well, one point I do understand: The Straight Story May 2013 #58
Integration, not education Nine May 2013 #59
“parallel societies” The Straight Story May 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»(Switzerland) Muslim girl...»Reply #61