Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
33. Judge Dread: John Roberts and Enemy Combatants
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 05:04 PM
Feb 2012

Here's what we're talking about:



Judge Dread

John Roberts and Enemy Combatants


by CHRIS FLOYD
CounterPunch
July 20, 2005

EXCERPT...

George W. Bush has granted himself the power to declare anyone on earth – including any American citizen – an "enemy combatant," for any reason he sees fit. He can render them up to torture, he can imprison them for life, he can even have them killed, all without charges, with no burden of proof, no standards of evidence, no legislative oversight, no appeal, no judicial process whatsoever except those that he himself deigns to construct, with whatever limitations he cares to impose. Nor can he ever be prosecuted for any order he issues, however criminal; in the new American system laid out by Bush’s legal minions, the Commander is sacrosanct, beyond the reach of any law or constitution.

This is not hyperbole. It is simply the reality of the United States today. The principle of unrestricted presidential power is now being codified into law and incorporated into the institutional structures of the state, as Deep Blade Journal reports in an excellent compendium of recent outrages against liberty.

For example, on July 15, a panel of federal appellate court judges upheld Bush’s sovereign right to dispose of "enemy combatants" any way he pleases, the Washington Post reports. In a chilling decision, the judges ruled that the Commander’s arbitrarily designated "enemies" are non-persons: neither the Geneva Conventions nor American military and domestic law apply to such garbage. Bush is now free to subject anyone he likes to the "military tribunal" system he has concocted – a brutal sham that some top retired military officials have denounced as a "kangaroo court" that will be used by tyrants around the world to "hide their oppression under U.S. precedent."

One of the kowtowing jurists on the appeals panel was none other than John G. Roberts. Four days after he affirmed Bush’s autocratic powers, Roberts was duly awarded with a nomination to the Supreme Court. Now he will be sitting in final judgment on this case – and any other challenges to Bush’s peremptory commands. This is what is known, in the tyrant trade, as "a safe pair of hands."

CONTINUED...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x141263



PS and most importantly: You are most welcome, PufPuf23! People like you make this a world worth living in and people like roberts a subject worth delving in.

you might also be interested in this RainDog Feb 2012 #1
Prof. Alexander delivers Truth regarding the racist and fascist natures of the War on Drugs. Octafish Feb 2012 #6
A sad time in American history. CanSocDem Feb 2012 #2
His means to occupying the Oval Office was to ensure there would be no ''October Surprise.'' Octafish Feb 2012 #7
The BFEE - the world's ultimate I'll-scratch-your-back-if-you-scratch mine club. Initech Feb 2012 #3
Indeed. Indeed. Indeed. Theirs is a line of toadies in service to warmongers going back generations. Octafish Feb 2012 #10
What I still don't get is why we can't prosecute them. Initech Feb 2012 #11
That's exactly why they keep scumbags like Roberts and Alito and Scalia in power. Octafish Feb 2012 #18
K&R....n/t unkachuck Feb 2012 #4
Oliver North luvs John Roberts Octafish Feb 2012 #21
No surprise. Almost all of W's people can be found somewhere in the the criminal ranks of the past. jwirr Feb 2012 #5
Poppy pardoned Caspar Weinberger and kept his own leg-assy outta the slammer. Octafish Feb 2012 #24
Gosh if you had asked me hootinholler Feb 2012 #8
How John Roberts Got to the Top: The Spectre of White Affirmative Action Octafish Feb 2012 #31
On a side note, Lawrence Walsh celebrated his 100th birthday last month. Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2012 #9
Judge Walsh is a Republican of the Old School, a man of Integrity. Octafish Feb 2012 #32
Thank you Octafish for not giving up. kr nt PufPuf23 Feb 2012 #12
Judge Dread: John Roberts and Enemy Combatants Octafish Feb 2012 #33
K&R (nt) T S Justly Feb 2012 #13
John Roberts had larger 2000 Florida recount role Octafish Feb 2012 #34
k and r niyad Feb 2012 #14
The youngest Chief Justice since John Marshall in 1801. Octafish Feb 2012 #36
Thank you for your effort and dedication in pulling this together so we can see the full picture suffragette Feb 2012 #15
You are most welcome, suffragette! The guy's friends with the likes of Clarence Thomas... Octafish Feb 2012 #37
And both he and Thomas clearly view rights as something for the privileged class and corporations, suffragette Feb 2012 #39
Ho-hum SoCalDem Feb 2012 #16
Understand, completely. My own Mrs. Octafish says, ''I am so glad I don't know what you know.'' Octafish Feb 2012 #38
K & R AzDar Feb 2012 #17
''No wonder Americans think Democrats don't stand for anything!'' Octafish Feb 2012 #40
"Just because I look drunk and stoned in the photo doesn't mean I am." - Bush (R) Miqqyy Feb 2012 #19
Wasted. Octafish Feb 2012 #41
K&R raouldukelives Feb 2012 #20
John Roberts claimed he never was in the Federalist Society, yet his name was on their books. Octafish Feb 2012 #42
Bookmarked. crazylikafox Feb 2012 #22
K&R laundry_queen Feb 2012 #23
thank you octafish for keeping this alive newspeak Feb 2012 #25
Roberts is our creepiest Justice, by far. hunter Feb 2012 #26
Damn I love your threads malaise Feb 2012 #27
Great one. HughBeaumont Feb 2012 #28
A memorable moment from the movie, "Syriana": Raffi Ella Feb 2012 #29
Interesting... Quantess Feb 2012 #30
Thanks for your work on this... countryjake Feb 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Know your BFEE: John Robe...»Reply #33