Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Watching a 'scandal' evaporate before our very eyes [View all]
Watching a 'scandal' evaporate before our very eyes
By Steve Benen
Rachel noted on the show last night that the controversy surrounding Benghazi effectively "went away" yesterday, and given the latest information, it's hard to imagine how any serious person could disagree.
The White House yesterday afternoon released the inter-agency communications that went into crafting the "talking points" requested by Congress last September. Lawmakers already saw these materials months ago -- they found nothing controversial at the time -- but Republicans and the media decided it was time to see them again...we learned what we already knew: there was no cover-up; State and the CIA engaged in a predictable bureaucratic "tug of war"; and this:
And with that, everything Republican conspiracy theorists desperately wanted Americans to believe -- there's a scandal; there's a cover-up; there's evidence the White House manipulated and lied about a crisis for political ends -- suddenly evaporated before our very eyes...note that most sensible people realized the right's conspiracy theories were wrong, which is why the so-called "controversy" was relegated to Republican media, until last Friday's report from ABC News pushed the story into the mainstream. That ABC News report, we now know, was wrong.
There's just nothing left. Trying to characterize this as a genuine political story worthy of attention has been a misguided partisan exercise for months, but now, it's reached the point of ridiculousness. Every reporter saying the White House is engulfed in "three scandals" is misleading the public -- there was a deadly attack against a U.S. diplomatic outpost last year, which left four Americans dead. It was a tragedy; it was not a political controversy.
Put a fork in the Benghazi story; it's done.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/05/16/18295499-watching-a-scandal-evaporate-before-our-very-eyes
By Steve Benen
Rachel noted on the show last night that the controversy surrounding Benghazi effectively "went away" yesterday, and given the latest information, it's hard to imagine how any serious person could disagree.
The White House yesterday afternoon released the inter-agency communications that went into crafting the "talking points" requested by Congress last September. Lawmakers already saw these materials months ago -- they found nothing controversial at the time -- but Republicans and the media decided it was time to see them again...we learned what we already knew: there was no cover-up; State and the CIA engaged in a predictable bureaucratic "tug of war"; and this:
The internal debate did not include political interference from the White House, according to the e-mails, which were provided to congressional intelligence committees several months ago.
And with that, everything Republican conspiracy theorists desperately wanted Americans to believe -- there's a scandal; there's a cover-up; there's evidence the White House manipulated and lied about a crisis for political ends -- suddenly evaporated before our very eyes...note that most sensible people realized the right's conspiracy theories were wrong, which is why the so-called "controversy" was relegated to Republican media, until last Friday's report from ABC News pushed the story into the mainstream. That ABC News report, we now know, was wrong.
There's just nothing left. Trying to characterize this as a genuine political story worthy of attention has been a misguided partisan exercise for months, but now, it's reached the point of ridiculousness. Every reporter saying the White House is engulfed in "three scandals" is misleading the public -- there was a deadly attack against a U.S. diplomatic outpost last year, which left four Americans dead. It was a tragedy; it was not a political controversy.
Put a fork in the Benghazi story; it's done.
http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/2013/05/16/18295499-watching-a-scandal-evaporate-before-our-very-eyes
"Every reporter saying the White House is engulfed in 'three scandals' is misleading the public"
That's our GOP shill media.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
all 3 now proven as dirty tricks. And the public saw through it all.Obama roped the dopes again.
graham4anything
May 2013
#1
"Every reporter saying the White House is engulfed in 'three scandals' is misleading the public"
Cirque du So-What
May 2013
#2
Even the ones on our side keep referring to the "Benghazi scandal," as if there were actually
tblue37
May 2013
#29
Down the road when another potential "scandal" is unearthed, I'm sure it will be ignored..n/t
monmouth3
May 2013
#3
I share your expectation. The Whitehouse email release means nothing to these people.
cheapdate
May 2013
#35
I don't feel very good that 2 elections were stolen and there were no repercussions. n/t
cui bono
May 2013
#43
Lthat et's see now where O where is that "lamestream" media? I'm sick of hearing
southernyankeebelle
May 2013
#8
Yes, and it will 'reappear' in 2016. 'Remember the Bengazi scandal?' they'll say about Hillary.
denverbill
May 2013
#14
I think the testimony by Pickering, if allowed by Issa-the-Assa, will completely finish it off.
DCBob
May 2013
#34
well I always thought the Benghazi "scandal" was a bunch of B.S. except to the extent that there was
Douglas Carpenter
May 2013
#38
Just because the Republicans are shilling this, (and they are) doesn't mean there isn't
truth2power
May 2013
#47