Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

markpkessinger

(8,926 posts)
Thu May 16, 2013, 10:10 AM May 2013

Folks, it just won't do to say "the IRS did nothing wrong" when it has already admitted that it DID [View all]

The IRS has admitted that groups whose name contained the words 'patriot' or 'tea party' were improperly targeted for special scrutiny, beyond what some other applicants for tax exempt status received. And the President has condemned that targeting in very strong terms. So it simply doesn't fly for Democrats, here or anywhere else, to insist they didn't. That train has already left that station, and when we Democrats refuse to acknowledge what the IRS has already admitted to, it makes out party look like a bunch of idiots.

From The Washington Post:

[font size=4]IRS admits targeting conservatives for tax scrutiny in 2012 election[/font]
By Zachary A. Goldfarb and Karen Tumulty,May 10, 2013

The Internal Revenue Service on Friday apologized for targeting groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names, confirming long-standing accusations by some conservatives that their applications for tax-exempt status were being improperly delayed and scrutinized.

Lois G. Lerner, the IRS official who oversees tax-exempt groups, said the “absolutely inappropriate” actions by “front-line people” were not driven by partisan motives.

Rather, Lerner said, they were a misguided effort to come up with an efficient means of dealing with a flood of applications from organizations seeking ­tax-exempt status between 2010 and 2012.

During that period, about 75 groups were selected for extra inquiry — including burdensome questionnaires and, in some cases, improper requests for the names of their donors — simply because of the words in their names, she said in a conference call with reporters.

< . . . >
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
But the main point of the Tea Party was to endorse Tea Party candidates! CJCRANE May 2013 #1
They had the right idea, but did it the wrong way. backscatter712 May 2013 #2
Also, Obama does not fire the IRS head unless they did something wrong. n-t Logical May 2013 #3
Well, I'll quibble with that a bit. . . markpkessinger May 2013 #5
I see your point. But I would hope Obama would not fire someone for no reason. Maybe I am.... Logical May 2013 #11
Here is an example of the White House reacting instead of finding out what the facts are.... xocet May 2013 #16
As much as I like Obama, in all faireness you are right! I was so furious over the whole Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #19
Actually I think he felt that had to fire someone. This guy was the Fall Guy. I don't believe Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #18
IRS should do more than target these political groups. Life Long Dem May 2013 #4
I agree, so long as that denial applies across the board to political groups n/t markpkessinger May 2013 #6
They haven't denied a single TeaBagger 501(c)4. Not. A. One. BlueCaliDem May 2013 #9
I read on here yesterday that 79 groups, or 82% of the total investigated, were denied. ieoeja May 2013 #13
It targeted the NAMES, not the political persuasion. n/t magellan May 2013 #7
The IRS should admit they wrote law and THAT is the wrong that they've done. BlueCaliDem May 2013 #8
+1 uponit7771 May 2013 #12
Inappropriate, sure. Misguided, yes. 'Wrong'... redqueen May 2013 #10
Would the people defending it do the same if it was Bush targeting liberal type names? Marrah_G May 2013 #14
The Bush administration DID target liberal groups. Going after the NAACP was legendary. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #21
do you suppose "peace" and"anti war" and "equal" or "community" or "democratic" librechik May 2013 #15
It would be wrong if they not only targeted the Teabagger groups, but also DENIED them 501(c)(4) Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #17
That does not mean we have to agree treestar May 2013 #20
...and yet they did. Not one of those groups were denied special tax-exempt status. Not one! Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #22
Which makes the "scandal" all the more ridiculous treestar May 2013 #23
They are so desperate and obsessed with destroying Obama and finally they got Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Folks, it just won't do t...