Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(151,051 posts)
7. But this one wouldn't have been looked at. It's a PAC.
Thu May 16, 2013, 11:06 AM
May 2013

It's still noxious, though, and is part of the problem. It's just not an example of what the IRS was looking for. They were looking at organizations that had submitted applications, but selectively. That was their mistake. The example organization never sent an application and wasn't applying for that status.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»IRS 501 Code: "must refra...»Reply #7