Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views. WOW. [View all]
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2325414/Men-physically-strong-likely-right-wing-political-views.htmlThe Daily Fail is officially a parody website.
Men who are physically strong are more likely to take a right wing political stance, while weaker men are inclined to support the welfare state, according to a new study.
Researchers discovered political motivations may have evolutionary links to physical strength.
Men's upper-body strength predicts their political opinions on economic redistribution, according to the research.
(snip)
Professor Petersen said: Our results demonstrate that physically weak males are more reluctant than physically strong males to assert their self-interest - just as if disputes over national policies were a matter of direct physical confrontation among small numbers of individuals, rather than abstract electoral dynamics among millions.
However, the researchers found no link between upper-body strength and redistribution opinions among women.

86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Men who are physically strong are more likely to have right wing political views. WOW. [View all]
HughBeaumont
May 2013
OP
As a physically strong male who is as far away from conservative as possible I say bullshit
Arcanetrance
May 2013
#3
I believe it. But who cares? The real purpose is to intimidate people, and that's what matters.
reformist2
May 2013
#5
Yep. Unfortunately, a lot of people confuse "representative" with "strong leader".
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2013
#27
It's almost as stupid as saying "People with Bad Teeth Tend to Be Jungian".
HughBeaumont
May 2013
#24
If it were only the paper. Somehow this tripe ended up in a peer reviewed periodical.
stevenleser
May 2013
#54
. . . and you definitely might not want to have your chips come in contact"
HughBeaumont
May 2013
#58
At least OUR shite media is SUBTLE in regards to their toxic narratives . . . for the most part.
HughBeaumont
May 2013
#22
Interesting. Good research and thanks for that. A weak correlation along with the old axiom
stevenleser
May 2013
#39
The other big problem is the big logical fail inherent in their proposed explanation.
lumberjack_jeff
May 2013
#46
Who knew? All these years, I'd thought that males with right wing political views
AndyA
May 2013
#19
Kiss my ass. No really, take it from the grandson of a Molly Maguire. Kiss my ass.
lumberjack_jeff
May 2013
#21
Rand and Ron Paul and David Duke are not physically strong. Neither was Jorg Haider.
graham4anything
May 2013
#35
I wonder if that earpiece leading to nowhere is really a defibulator . . .
HughBeaumont
May 2013
#66