Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
6. The original AP story was sparce on details re the double-agent. Those were provided later by WaPo &
Thu May 16, 2013, 01:12 PM
May 2013

NYT. The original AP story is linked.

The fact that Brennan soon confirmed the operation was under CIA "control" and that there never was any real danger to the US does go to confirm that AP had not blown an ongoing operation, and that no lives were endangered by printing the story. Instead, the May 7 AP report was about events that occurred in Sept. when the double-agent was extracted, and that operation was long over by the time it was leaked. AP didn't tell AQAP anything they didn't already know.

The WH and DOJ have overreacted and overreached on this display of anti-leaker power against a major media organization. Like the IRS probe of c(4) organizations with TP in their names, this has been a mistake, and the Administration should now back away carefully.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bomb Plot Briefing May Un...»Reply #6