Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(10,559 posts)

7. He is a Peeping Tom. They are not in public.

Thu May 16, 2013, 02:51 PM

May 2013

The expectation of privacy - and the fact they didn't sign consent - guarantees a lawsuit.

I hope he gets prosecuted as a stalker. CREEPY GUY.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tribeca residents furious over being secretly photographed for new Chelsea art exhibit [View all] Are_grits_groceries May 2013 OP

People should learn to close their blinds. CBGLuthier May 2013 #1

I knew this would come up. Are_grits_groceries May 2013 #2

Did you forget the sarcasm thingie? pnwest May 2013 #3

yes zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #6

Hi Tech peeping Tom treestar May 2013 #4

He is a Peeping Tom. They are not in public. IdaBriggs May 2013 #7

While I think it's an invasion of privacy, the photograph of the expectant ScreamingMeemie May 2013 #8

Big deal. Close the blinds. closeupready May 2013 #10

Peeping Tomism and commercial exploitation of these people geek tragedy May 2013 #11

I would be totally pissed off and consulting with an attorney. n/t RebelOne May 2013 #13