Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GiaGiovanni

(1,247 posts)
20. If physics is your argument, then bikes should not be on the road with cars at all
Thu May 16, 2013, 04:10 PM
May 2013

It's like having a 150 pound young man playing pro football with well trained 250-300 pounders. It can't work.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

cogent argument? datasuspect May 2013 #1
If physics is your argument, then bikes should not be on the road with cars at all GiaGiovanni May 2013 #20
That already happens. Travis_0004 May 2013 #29
The place kicker is more like the pedestrian: he shows up temporarily on the field GiaGiovanni May 2013 #31
Does that include brake lights, turn signals,liability insurance, and road use taxes? oneshooter May 2013 #2
we can only dream zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #8
The law requires none of those for bikes where I live. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #15
I think that's irresponsible of the state GiaGiovanni May 2013 #26
The things in your first paragraph are indeed required here. Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #27
Bikes are often covered by auto insurance Travis_0004 May 2013 #30
It seems cyclists have no insurance coverage for the accidents they cause GiaGiovanni May 2013 #34
That makes more sense GiaGiovanni May 2013 #33
I think that eventually that will happen GiaGiovanni May 2013 #19
Hybrid/electric cars should have to put a baseball card in their spokes NightWatcher May 2013 #3
I always thought they should have speakers IDemo May 2013 #6
I never thought of that Yo_Mama May 2013 #14
I always make it a point... Lizzie Poppet May 2013 #4
Breezing through stop signs when no one else is there might sound ok, but GiaGiovanni May 2013 #21
Idaho law IDemo May 2013 #5
That's the law, and a good one at that. Gormy Cuss May 2013 #7
Generally thats how it works in Oregon as well bhikkhu May 2013 #11
The stoplight law sounds problematic GiaGiovanni May 2013 #22
It's the law, and a good one at that meow2u3 May 2013 #28
The Idaho law allows cyclists to run the stop sign GiaGiovanni May 2013 #35
If bikes can run stop signs, what's to say there won't be accidents? meow2u3 May 2013 #36
I'm in total agreement GiaGiovanni May 2013 #37
As a pedestrian, I am in total agreement. smirkymonkey May 2013 #42
In California cyclists are liable to the same traffic laws nadinbrzezinski May 2013 #9
I find this to be very true GiaGiovanni May 2013 #23
Only if they do first bhikkhu May 2013 #10
No, cyclists are special ..... oldhippie May 2013 #12
Interesting that you don't mention the single most common violation among drivers Fumesucker May 2013 #13
Only after you prove you NEVER exceed the posted speed limit in your motor vehicle. Ikonoklast May 2013 #16
I have exceeded the speed limit plenty of times, probably nearly every time I drive a car Fumesucker May 2013 #18
Speeders are one main reason cyclists and motorists should be particularly careful GiaGiovanni May 2013 #24
I wasn't "ranting and raving" about anything Fumesucker May 2013 #38
"Rant and rail" was the expression and it did not refer to you GiaGiovanni May 2013 #39
I was the one who mentioned speeders because you certainly didn't in your OP Fumesucker May 2013 #40
It was not a personal comment, but a general one GiaGiovanni May 2013 #41
Why? Criminals won't follow the laws, they're criminals! Robb May 2013 #17
Laws are usually followed by the law-abiding and ignored by criminals GiaGiovanni May 2013 #25
And don't forget... zappaman May 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Proposition: All drivers ...»Reply #20