Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

du rec. nt xchrom May 2013 #1
I think I'll side with protecting American lives and not giving them up for sake of scoop uponit7771 May 2013 #2
this had nothing to do with protecting American lives. and yes, holder is lying cali May 2013 #4
Oh ah? GoneOffShore May 2013 #13
The government can go in front of a judge and explain their reasons Luminous Animal May 2013 #29
What judge? Where? nt msanthrope May 2013 #34
You can protect American lives AND not trash the Constitution. Hissyspit May 2013 #35
What? Now you tell us. nm rhett o rick May 2013 #73
What makes you think anything of the sort happened? MNBrewer May 2013 #39
freedum!!1 frylock May 2013 #56
What a very good American you are. n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #58
Wow... Where Do You Live... And Why Is It So Dangerous There ??? WillyT May 2013 #62
"Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." - George W. Bush, 2001 Fire Walk With Me May 2013 #70
You have the right idea. Give up your rights and just go with fascism. rhett o rick May 2013 #71
Looks like a "drop a turd and run" kinda post. nm rhett o rick May 2013 #74
Sounds eerily reminiscent ... GeorgeGist May 2013 #3
The ACLU opposes a national registry. Let's assume that the NRA does as well. So what? AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #47
The thing that annoys me is that the DOJ's able to do this with just a subpoena. backscatter712 May 2013 #5
The subpoena was issued by a grand jury Warpy May 2013 #28
But they were to tell so AP what they were doing so AP could take it before a judge. Lady Freedom Returns May 2013 #38
Great Info..,. Thank You !!! WillyT May 2013 #67
Which is why I am withholding judgement for now SteveG May 2013 #43
"The subpoena was issued by a grand jury"? Says who? Someone else speculated about this, but AnotherMcIntosh May 2013 #48
I actually think a warrant would have been difficult wercal May 2013 #76
That's the point of requiring a warrant. backscatter712 May 2013 #77
Oh I agree wercal May 2013 #79
Well, ProSense May 2013 #6
Pushing the passage of the Shield Law is the good that can come out of this? Matariki May 2013 #21
You will not gen an answer but 10 links to other posts. n-t Logical May 2013 #49
DOJ wasn't going after the AP, they are going after the government leaker. Tx4obama May 2013 #7
If there really was a leaker "that could put lives at risk".... former9thward May 2013 #12
I don't remember the full story, but when the fact of the leak came out ... Tx4obama May 2013 #16
This is what happens when you burn double-agents within Al Qaeda. Zen Democrat May 2013 #8
I support the ACLU 100% of the time MNBrewer May 2013 #42
The ACLU was thrown under the bus here long ago. DesMoinesDem May 2013 #9
If it was a Republican administration that did this, DU would be hopping mad. Matariki May 2013 #10
Actually, ProSense May 2013 #14
Actually yes. Most folks here would be VERY angry over sweeping surveillence of reporters Matariki May 2013 #15
Well, ProSense May 2013 #17
The Plame case targeted specific reporter(s) for a specific reason Matariki May 2013 #18
Again ProSense May 2013 #19
They were spied on. Matariki May 2013 #25
Really? ProSense May 2013 #32
I though that many Dems your wrong about targeting reporters in regards to the Plame case... Luminous Animal May 2013 #30
You are correct tavalon May 2013 #26
Same here. And I'll list off the good stuff that Obama has accomplished in his defense. Matariki May 2013 #33
It would seem to me, that anyone who has been here for a long time, tavalon May 2013 #37
Some people have a very 'team sport' approach to politics Matariki May 2013 #40
You just hit my personal irk nail on the head tavalon May 2013 #45
+10000 LittleBlue May 2013 #41
Yes, no doubt the DU is as biased as the GOP was about Bush at times. n-t Logical May 2013 #50
SO TRUE. forestpath May 2013 #60
If the ACLU opposes the probe, will Teabaggers favor it? Viking12 May 2013 #11
Huge K&R, and let's keep it in context, too. woo me with science May 2013 #20
The ACLU got this one right. - nt badtoworse May 2013 #22
I side with the ACLU tavalon May 2013 #23
I'm waiting a little longer to pass judgement. We may learn later that someone was killed or placed kelliekat44 May 2013 #24
Probably the first time I haven't just jumped on board w/the ACLU -- I agree, gateley May 2013 #27
"There ought to be some limits on what media or journalists publish...." mike_c May 2013 #31
There already ARE limits demwing May 2013 #44
well, I'm talking about JOURNALISM, not just writing generally.... mike_c May 2013 #63
So, we've established my proposal as sound in principle demwing May 2013 #64
BTW - if you started from the premise that journalists have objective standards demwing May 2013 #65
There was/is a grand jury investigation going on about the AP...... Little Star May 2013 #36
I'll side with the outed agent who saved hundreds of lives on that Detroit Airplane. DevonRex May 2013 #46
there is a small bunch here who don't believe that there are any real terrorists OKNancy May 2013 #52
Same bunch who believe Dzhokhar DevonRex May 2013 #53
Ya Know... You Are Under Attack In Oklahoma... Just By Conservative Republicans... WillyT May 2013 #69
ACLU!? Aren't they under the bus yet!? Why.. they oughtta be! villager May 2013 #51
I'm confused. Didn't the "Patriot" ACT They_Live May 2013 #54
ACLU has had an axe to grind with Obama lately. mwrguy May 2013 #55
"The media's purpose is to keep the public informed..." randome May 2013 #57
I don't have a problem with the AP "scandal" but I also realize that the ship has sailed underpants May 2013 #59
Finding a national security leak JimDandy May 2013 #61
I agree with the ACLU. nt Demo_Chris May 2013 #66
The government needs to quit taking people's phone records without a warrant right away. nt limpyhobbler May 2013 #68
Give it up already madokie May 2013 #72
Are You An American Or Not ??? WillyT May 2013 #78
I'm with you. NaturalHigh May 2013 #75
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I Think I'll Side With Th...»Reply #67