Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(38,437 posts)

13. Not real crazy about your tone and your demands on my time.

Fri May 17, 2013, 10:16 AM

May 2013

The answer is in the document. If it is crucial to you, find it. Pleasing you is not on my radar screen.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The IRS scrutiny of the Tea Party organizations was ham-handed [View all] Jackpine Radical May 2013 OP

Most of the applications were not "teabagger" applications. Buzz Clik May 2013 #3

That would not have been a problem Jackpine Radical May 2013 #5

That step has to at least PRECEDE any other form of discriminatory targeting. Jackpine Radical May 2013 #7

Nothing extraordinary, but some activities were discovered. Buzz Clik May 2013 #8

so detail for us all zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #9

.. Buzz Clik May 2013 #10

so why can't you answer the question? zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #11

Not real crazy about your tone and your demands on my time. Buzz Clik May 2013 #13

yes, that is a normal reaction zerosumgame0005 May 2013 #14

Read the article. Quit being so damned lazy. Buzz Clik May 2013 #15

It's not o much the looking at them that created the problem. Jackpine Radical May 2013 #4

It was (is) an elaborate money-laundering scheme... kentuck May 2013 #2