Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uppityperson

(116,006 posts)
34. So your complaint is that information was not released to the public fast enough? And again
Fri May 17, 2013, 10:56 AM
May 2013

"innocent until proven guilty" is in a court of law. Have you ever done something wrong, are you guilty of anything? I am guilty of lying to my parents when I was a teenager, but never went to court, a trial. That is MY point. There is a difference between being guilty of something and being guilty in a court of law.

Regarding the speed at which the photos were released, I'd rather they be careful and release ones that were clear and correct than ones that were not the right guy(s) or blurry. Accuracy when getting the public involved is very important.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I suppose this will be admissable in court. boston bean May 2013 #1
I suppose he thought he'd be dead when they read that Generic Other May 2013 #2
I don't think so. boston bean May 2013 #3
The person does not have to die, just have thought they were when they said it treestar May 2013 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Mnemosyne May 2013 #4
Maybe the note was written in blood inside the hull and the police..... Brother Buzz May 2013 #5
Ya never know, at least we never will! Mnemosyne May 2013 #6
It says "on the inside of the boat." morningfog May 2013 #11
Missed that, thanks. nt Mnemosyne May 2013 #12
Why is that impossible? treestar May 2013 #18
As do I. NCTraveler May 2013 #19
I never said it was impossible. Just didn't strike me as a big writer. nt Mnemosyne May 2013 #25
+1 HiPointDem May 2013 #21
Marker on inside of boat. Not pen and paper.nt msanthrope May 2013 #36
He wrote on the inside of the boat................. Marrah_G May 2013 #42
It took investigators a month to find a note inside a small boat? GoneFishin May 2013 #7
Who says it took them a month to find it? zappaman May 2013 #8
They obviously saw it before now, HappyMe May 2013 #13
Sure, because he just happened to have a notepad & pen on him when he was fleeing for his life ... Myrina May 2013 #9
He wrote it on the boat itself Yo_Mama May 2013 #14
Makes the boat even more valuable/historic treestar May 2013 #20
I'd destroy it, if it were mine Yo_Mama May 2013 #29
Indeed Mr Dixon May 2013 #40
Derp Derp Derp He had paper and pen??? Derp Derp Derp WilliamPitt May 2013 #10
Cute white boys can't be terrorists! Yo_Mama May 2013 #15
Could not have said it better. zappaman May 2013 #16
A six derp alert from Will Pitt! Generic Other May 2013 #27
sharpie! librechik May 2013 #22
The dumb in this thread is actually starting to make me feel sad snooper2 May 2013 #23
What if the trial reveals DT did not plant the bomb? temmer May 2013 #24
Are you questioning if he was one of the bombers? Who do you think did the bombings and why? uppityperson May 2013 #26
innocent until proven guilty temmer May 2013 #28
"innocent until proven guilty" is only in a court of law. Lots of people are guilty of lots of uppityperson May 2013 #30
It's up to you to respond temmer May 2013 #31
People have a tendency to confuse presumption of innocence in a court of law with being guilty in uppityperson May 2013 #32
Have you seen the video? temmer May 2013 #33
So your complaint is that information was not released to the public fast enough? And again uppityperson May 2013 #34
I am Marrah_G May 2013 #43
UPDATE: Tsarnaev apparently aims to repeal his "confessions" temmer May 2013 #35
No...his confessions will not be 'worthless.' The boat writing will msanthrope May 2013 #37
I respectfully disagree temmer May 2013 #38
Um, no. Neither of your claims about the evidence go to the issue of admissibility in msanthrope May 2013 #39
I stay corrected temmer May 2013 #41
Repeal? What does that even mean? And the prosecutors didn't miss any deadline..... msanthrope May 2013 #44
Source temmer May 2013 #45
You are using Iranian State TV and a guy with an economics degree? That explains a lot. msanthrope May 2013 #46
you're funny temmer May 2013 #47
A press release? By whom? Why not cite the original? You see I doubt the original claims msanthrope May 2013 #48
Enough palaver - you can find the story everywhere. Just look for yourself temmer May 2013 #49
The only story I found was that prosecutors claimed exception to the 30 day rule msanthrope May 2013 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Note: B...»Reply #34