Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Robert Reich: The Sad Spectacle of Obama’s Super PAC [View all]
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/02/08-3Published on Wednesday, February 8, 2012 by Robert Reich
The Sad Spectacle of Obamas Super PAC
by Robert Reich
<edit>
But would refusing to be corrupted this way really amount to unilateral disarmament? To the contrary, I think it would have given the President a rallying cry that nearly all Americans would get behind: More of the nations wealth and political power is now in the hands of fewer people and large corporations than since the era of the robber barons of the Gilded Age. I will not allow our democracy to be corrupted by this! I will fight to take back our government!
Small donations would have flooded the Obama campaign, overwhelming Romneys billionaire super PACs. The people would have been given a chance to be heard.
The sad truth is Obama has never really occupied the high ground on campaign finance. He refused public financing in 2008. Once president, he didnt go to bat for a system of public financing that would have made it possible for candidates to raise enough money from small donors and matching public funds they wouldnt need to rely on a few billionaires pumping unlimited sums into super PACS. He hasnt even fought for public disclosure of super PAC donations.
And now hes made a total mockery of the Courts naïve belief that super PACs would remain separate from individual campaigns, by officially endorsing his own super PAC and allowing campaign manager Jim Messina and even cabinet officers to speak at his super PAC events. Obama will not appear at such events but he, Michelle Obama, and Vice President Joe Biden will encourage support of the Obama super PAC.
more...
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"But would refusing to be corrupted this way really amount to unilateral disarmament?" Yes. Duh.
TheWraith
Feb 2012
#4
Dramatic much? Robert Reich's fortune telling ability aside, refusing to take PAC money when
renie408
Feb 2012
#11
great! we can spend our money on liberal/progressive candidates lower down ballot instead of O nt
msongs
Feb 2012
#12
the koch brothers will spend their fortunes to destroy Obama, he'd be a fool not to have an s/pac
spanone
Feb 2012
#13
Yes ... Obama should disarm himself so that after GOP Super PACs win the election ...
JoePhilly
Feb 2012
#19
Sorry guy, Presidential elections are life and death decisions anymore.
TwilightGardener
Feb 2012
#22
I agree, the oposite is a piss poor excuse to lose to the bastards who are in the GOP now
uponit7771
Feb 2012
#38
No, they are a great Democratic weapon now! They are good now, Obama said so.
Dragonfli
Feb 2012
#62
What good does it do to stand on principle when the other guy is standing on...
renie408
Feb 2012
#59