Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

mick063

(2,424 posts)
11. Here is the problem
Fri May 17, 2013, 08:48 PM
May 2013

You are hooked on their crack.


The old form of retirement, pensions, were deemed legal for thievery by our "justice" system. Large swaths of our population had a lifetime of work indirectly stolen.

Buy a company, strip it of assets, put it in steep debt, declare it bankrupt, and the final step, shed the liability of honoring the retirement plans of the employees. They go after the pension plans in the guise of company insolvency.

So now you believe you can trust your IRA's to these folks? Now you think the government will protect you from those retirement thieves?

Ponder this....... 401K and IRA's are so relatively new, there is not enough data to suggest they are viable as retirement plans to begin with.

They have not survived the test of multiple generations. They have not even survived the test of a single generation when the full lifespan of current recipients are taken in to account.

Yet, you are committed. You have no way out. You suffer from a new disease known as "interest alignment". You are forgiving of Exxon drilling in arctic wilderness if your retirement is invested in Exxon. You are forgiving of sweatshops in Bangladesh if your retirement is invested in WalMart. You are forgiving of pumping organic chemicals into our aqua firs. You are forgiving of companies reducing "operational costs" by moving their operations abroad. You are forgiving of the ill conceived plans laid out by our money brokers.

They have happily passed you the crack pipe. Now they are dreaming up a scheme to take your 401k. Believe me. It is coming. Just like Pensions. Just like Social Security. They want it all.

Myself? I invest in three month Treasury Bills. If my federal government goes belly up, there isn't much of a retirement to look forward to anyway. Further, I can now fully support taxing the Holy Shit out of those criminals on Wall Street. I'm not invested in them.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kr HiPointDem May 2013 #1
Maybe instead of taxing Wall Street Turbineguy May 2013 #2
Once Wall Street has devoured the middle class and poor, they will be in their own economy liberal N proud May 2013 #3
Du rec. Nt xchrom May 2013 #4
not good enough MrYikes May 2013 #5
Why do you assume it would only impact Wall Street? badtoworse May 2013 #6
Unless you are a computer, why would you care? eridani May 2013 #7
I'm a mutual fund investor and the tax would be added onto the fees I pay the fund manager badtoworse May 2013 #8
Ordinary investors won't be paying much. Ordinary people own very little of the stock market eridani May 2013 #9
You haven't broken it out badtoworse May 2013 #10
If the increase were significant, you would need to find a better manager. Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #12
Non-productive? Without investors, we wouldn't have an economy... badtoworse May 2013 #13
Yes, non-productive. Like the barter economy that is used as justification for a number Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #17
Here is the problem mick063 May 2013 #11
My wife and I have had IRA's and 401k's for 30 years badtoworse May 2013 #14
When corporatists own the government mick063 May 2013 #18
You'd be smarter to worry about the banksters grabbing your money eridani May 2013 #19
I'm really confused here. What you wrote is the essence of "I've got mine, fuck you". Egalitarian Thug May 2013 #20
I believe in equal opportunity, not equal outcome badtoworse May 2013 #21
Sales tax Fumesucker May 2013 #15
Agree. Some states even tax the sale of food and/or medicine. byeya May 2013 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dean Baker: Cutting Soci...»Reply #11