Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

defacto7

(14,162 posts)
58. Thanks for the update...
Sat May 18, 2013, 12:26 AM
May 2013

I actually agree with you on most of your rant. I have no special untarnished place in my mind for Kennedy necessarily. But there are some nuances of history you sort of broad brushed in your earlier post that don't help your point. Some historians think with some semblance of reason that Kennedy could have been assassinated for wanting to get out of Vietnam. Too much money to be made to let him get in the way. Others will disagree but not with better proposals, they just don't like that idea. As for your take on the Bay of Pigs, that depends on your take on the Soviet Union at the time and their reasons for trying to deploy nuclear missiles in Cuba. Now we talk worry about nukes in kilotons, then it was megatons. We were closer to nuclear annihilation when it was Reagan vs. Andropov in 1983.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They just can't stand him [View all] Cane4Dems May 2013 OP
and the APs will back up whatever shitnonsense they dream up. Whisp May 2013 #1
I Think It Is More Than They Just Can't Stand Him Or He Is Black..... global1 May 2013 #2
He breaks their sterotypes and that's what drives them insane. JoePhilly May 2013 #4
+1 freshwest May 2013 #21
Please marry me NOW!!! +1,000!!!!!! Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #29
Remember Kennedy? Bannakaffalatta May 2013 #3
Um, wha...? AnnetteJacobs May 2013 #6
What have i ever done to you? Bannakaffalatta May 2013 #22
Welcome to DU... defacto7 May 2013 #39
Done that Bannakaffalatta May 2013 #57
Thanks for the update... defacto7 May 2013 #58
Not so treestar May 2013 #18
it was watergate that really opened the gate, so to speak hfojvt May 2013 #25
Sometimes I think The Daily Show presents the story better than any of the news outlets. gateley May 2013 #28
Bill Clinton n/t Enrique May 2013 #5
I'll throw a couple pennies in there too madokie May 2013 #7
K&R 1ProudAtheist May 2013 #8
Amen to that! nt caledesi May 2013 #12
Obama is this.... Sophiegirl May 2013 #9
Soph.... TinkerTot55 May 2013 #10
We have our winner. Brigid May 2013 #15
In fairness, I don't think it's entirely racism JohnnyRingo May 2013 #11
People discredit the argument by muddling it with racism Cosmocat May 2013 #19
yeah i understand your point but... Cane4Dems May 2013 #20
Nonsense Cosmocat May 2013 #46
Sorry. It's ENTIRELY racism!! Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #30
And I think they'd use the same total scandal immersion... JohnnyRingo May 2013 #43
I agree: to those at "the top", EVERYTHING is about the acquisition, bartering, & uses of POWER patrice May 2013 #54
I humbly disagree. nt clarice May 2013 #55
To this day, the tin foil crowd of rabid conservatives think the Clintons are murderers. Beacool May 2013 #48
Exactly -- MURDER. And Limpballs and McCain attacking a young Chelsea... WorseBeforeBetter May 2013 #49
Yes, I don't think that Chelsea had turned 13 yet. Beacool May 2013 #50
Yep. It takes a real big man to call a 13-year-old girl ugly. WorseBeforeBetter May 2013 #51
I don't think it's really about race thesquanderer May 2013 #13
We liberals really need to come to grips about this: IT'S RACE!!! Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #33
Exactly. They'd support Allen West, Alan Keyes, tblue May 2013 #37
No they would NOT support those people like they would rMoney for instance because they're black uponit7771 May 2013 #44
Here You Go Marta Steele May 2013 #14
I don't think it's race as such, but the alarm that the WASP longtime hegemony's days are numbered Populist_Prole May 2013 #16
Doesn't that prove it's racism? Read what you wrote again. It's race. Plain and simple. Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #31
Amen, Amen, Amen treestar May 2013 #17
k&r.. spanone May 2013 #23
They impeached Clinton over oral sex and he is white. Beacool May 2013 #24
Be honest. It's because he's a Democrat, but add race to that. Even Bill said it himself... Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #32
As Joy was saying, it's the only thing the party agrees on. gateley May 2013 #26
...and many here on DU as well... Liberal_Stalwart71 May 2013 #27
They hated Clinton too. Impeached him too. tblue May 2013 #34
They were brutal to Carter, too Art_from_Ark May 2013 #38
They just can't stand him grammiepammie May 2013 #35
For a slither of the Republican party, especially the teabagger element, you are right. Tarheel_Dem May 2013 #36
Unfortunately race is ever present in one way or another defacto7 May 2013 #40
I think they got jealous, we were fighting with ourselves Rex May 2013 #41
"Poverty of ideas." moondust May 2013 #42
I don't think it is personal; They would do the very same thing to ANY President that is a Democrat. corkhead May 2013 #45
YES. If Hillary or Joe Biden were President the Republicans would just let all this stuff slide. Nye Bevan May 2013 #47
So, if they hate blacks, why don't they look at the half of Obama that is white? Frustratedlady May 2013 #52
Being half white makes it worse Bannakaffalatta May 2013 #59
Agreed. Sheldon Cooper May 2013 #53
So true... go west young man May 2013 #56
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»They just can't stand him»Reply #58