Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

farmbo

(3,152 posts)

8. We need to be doing screen grabs of all these "social service organizations"

Reply to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sat May 18, 2013, 11:46 AM

May 2013

... So Joe & Judy Sixpack can see how they used exempt funds during the campaign to stoke the Obama Hate Machine.

And because the IRS had to back off any serious screening effort, they are now fueling 40% of their attack adds on the taxpayer's dime as a 501 c 4.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Do you think the public supports tax exemptions for attack ads? [View all] Bjorn Against May 2013 OP

Karl Rove's self-determined salary is tax exempt Generic Other May 2013 #1

NOPE Voice for Peace May 2013 #2

The President had this to say in 2010: Life Long Dem May 2013 #3

+1 freshwest May 2013 #6

KICK patrice May 2013 #7

Instead of reacting to this latest problem within the IRS, murray hill farm May 2013 #4

Absolutely - nt dreamnightwind May 2013 #13

The purpose of these corporate persons is to acquire and to preserve tax exemptions so that they can patrice May 2013 #5

We need to be doing screen grabs of all these "social service organizations" farmbo May 2013 #8

You think Joe Sixpack cares?... awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #10

The average republican voter does... awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #9

I think even most Republicans hate attack ads Bjorn Against May 2013 #11

I live in Texas... awoke_in_2003 May 2013 #12